SEPTA 50: A Prehistory of our Much Beloved/Maligned Transit Agency

It took 60 years of trial and (mostly) error to get to the point at which Philly mass transit needed to be saved.

This year marks SEPTA’s golden anniversary, and this month, the agency will formally celebrate a half-century of keeping Philly moving. It’s done a pretty good job of it, too — but it’s done so in a characteristically Philadelphia fashion, which is to say, with barely enough to get by.

I’ve said in this space that we have an amazing mass transit system here. What may be even more amazing, however, is that we have one at all.

Last year, the American Public Transportation Association honored SEPTA as the Outstanding Large Transit System of 2012. When I tell people SEPTA deserved that award, I usually get puzzled looks at best and “There, there” pats on the head at worst. Some of these people, however, understand when I explain that the agency won the award for keeping this sprawling network running using only duct tape and baling wire.

The good news is that with a steady, guaranteed funding stream in hand, SEPTA can finally put away the duct tape and baling wire and break out the hammers, saws and shovels in order to restore the system to good physical health. But SEPTA was actually following ancient Philly practice with the patchwork jobs.

SEPTA, you see, was created to keep metropolitan Philadelphia’s transit systems from completely falling to pieces. Established to bring the subways, commuter railroads, and bus systems back up to snuff, it spent much of the first half of its life scrambling to make sure they ran at all.

Even before its creation, SEPTA’s predecessors were doing the same thing: scrambling to make sure the buses and trains ran while not quite keeping up with the physical plant needs. It’s a Philly tradition that stretches all the way back to…


This was the year the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, formed the year before through mergers and acquisitions of several street railway companies, began work on the city’s first rapid transit line. The city gave a franchise in 1902 to the Market Street Elevated Passenger Railway Company, which the PRT then leased, to build an elevated rapid transit line from the Delaware River to the western city line, with only two stipulations: The company has to pay for it and it has to be buried between the Delaware and Schuylkill rivers.

The PRT, financially shaky from the start, could only barely afford that. The construction project nearly bankrupted the company and took four years to complete, opening in…


Philadelphians celebrated the completion of the city’s first rapid transit line, but at City Hall, they were upset it took so long. Deciding that it could do better by building subways itself, as Boston had done and New York did via a public-private partnership, the city creates a new Department of City Transit and charges its first commissioner, A. Merritt Taylor, to draw up a plan for more subways for the city. While he’s working on it, however, the PRT lands back in the soup in …


An early sign of the contentious labor relations that would later plague both the private operators and SEPTA comes when the Amalgamated Association of Street and Electric Railway Employees of America (today’s Amalgamated Transit Union) demands the PRT give streetcar operators a substantial raise, a shorter work day and recognition of the union. The PRT refuses and a violent strike ensues when the company brings in strikebreakers. The PRT relents under the threat of a general strike, but replaces the Amalgamated union with an in-house union. The confrontation would be repeated in…


Another strike occurs when the PRT fires employees who joined the Amalgamated union. Again, the PRT brings in strikebreakers, riots break out, and this time, a general strike ensues, bringing nearly all commerce in the city to a halt. A long period of labor peace would begin the following year when the company names Thomas A. Mitten its president; Mitten implements a “cooperative plan” that guarantees a percentage of company revenues be devoted to wages and benefits and sets up co-operative buying clubs for workers. This in turn means everyone can turn their attention back to the physical plant. Here’s how it grew — or didn’t:


Taylor presents his plan for seven new subway and elevated lines, including a Center City loop subway, to Council. But there’s an election that fall.


A new mayor appoints a new City Transit Commissioner, who blasts Taylor’s plan. City Council adopts it anyway.


Work begins on the trunk lines of Taylor’s system with construction under City Hall, the start of work on the Frankford Elevated Railway, and digging out the first segments of the loop subway.


The city runs out of money and halts work on everything but the Frankford Elevated. The hollowing-out of the space for City Hall station is also completed lest the building fall into the hole.


The Frankford Elevated opens. For the record, it took the city seven years to build it, three more years than it took the PRT to build the Market Street line.


Work resumes on the Broad Street subway, minus the loop. Though fitful efforts to provide for more spurs and extensions will continue in the years that follow, efforts to actually build any of the branches save the one to the Northeast are now dead. The Broad Street Subway opens in 1927, with a spur down Ridge Avenue to Eighth and Market streets opening in 1932. A Depression-era public works project extends the subway to Snyder Avenue in South Philly in 1937 — and that was that for subway construction in Philadelphia until after World War II.


The Great Depression does what the Market Street line almost did: finish off the PRT. The company reorganizes the following year as the Philadelphia Transportation Company (PTC).


The era of contentious labor relations returns with a wildcat strike by white motormen, newly represented by a union that opposed the action, the Transport Workers Union.


National City Lines, a company formed by a consortium of General Motors and several automotive suppliers, takes over management of the PTC. Soon afterward, the trickle of streetcar line abandonments that began in the Depression but halted during World War II became a flood. Meanwhile, the two railroads that operate the region’s commuter rail lines, the Pennsylvania and the Reading, begin to falter financially, leading the city to undertake programs to support improvements to and subsidize passenger operations of the railroads within the city. These early programs laid the groundwork for a regional agreement in…


Representatives of the five metropolitan counties form the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Compact (SEPACT), an agreement to support the operations of the region’s struggling mass transit systems. From this pact, SEPTA would emerge in 1964.

The rest, as they say, is history. That history has included its share of labor strife and a few tragedies, but on the whole, SEPTA has succeeded at its basic mission. The region’s transit system has remained intact and even added some noteworthy facilities, including the Airport Line and the Commuter Tunnel. SEPTA has been asking riders to share their stories and memories of Philadelphia transit; some of the best have been posted on the agency’s 50th Anniversary website along with lots of pictures. And on June 19th, SEPTA will host a commemoration in front of its 1234 Market Street headquarters, complete with vintage vehicles and more. There we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief that back in the 1960s, our region’s leaders had the foresight to recognize the need to preserve a valuable asset, one that gets millions where they want to go day in and day out. (Save for the occasional strike.)

Follow @MarketStEl on Twitter.

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • kclo3

    Indeed, SEPTA was the first municipal public transit agency of its kind because of Philadelphia’s relationship with the commuter railroads. In fact, there seems to have been attempts at public funding of the railroads before SEPTA’s creation; Operation Northwest in the 1950s was one such instance, improving service on the Reading Chestnut Hill line.

    • Sandy Smith

      Though I didn’t refer to it by name, it was that project I was talking about in the 1950s paragraph above.

      And while SEPTA is indeed a metropolitan public transit pioneer, I’m afraid that there’s an agency in Boston that predates it – and I’m not talking about the MBTA, created in the same year as SEPTA, but its predecessor, the Metropolitan Transit Authority, which dates to 1947.

      • Jorno

        Both are a piece of garbage. SEPTA is most efficient

    • Joe Clark

      The 1st publicly funded transit was Detroit Street Railways. There had been an attempt to have publicly funded transit in Detroit under Mayor John Peter Altgeld but the courts in Michigan ruled against that. In 1908 it looked like a sure thing in Cleveland, Tom Jonson was elected Mayor with the support of the left leaning streetcar union, promising to have publicly funded mass transit. However it was not to be, Johnson proposed to have new streetcars that required one man operation and the plan fell apart.

  • Joe Clark

    1, The PRT did not begin in 1903 it began the year before, the Government Documents of the Main Branch of the FLP has a copy. 2 there was no Mayoral election in Philadelphia in either 1912 or 1913. The most recent Mayoral election before 1913 was 1911, the winner was Rudolph (The Old Dutch Cleasner) Blankenberg who appointed Taylor Transit Commissioner. In 1915 the voters elected Thomas B. Smith Mayor, he retained Taylor as Transit Commissioner until 1916. 3 Although Mitten promised “A Cooperative Plan” it never materailized as promised. The Amalgated was supposed to represent the employees, but they were defeated under very dubious circumstances. Ultimately the same company union that represented the PRT that had been booted out before 1910 came back. What did in the PRT was a combination of the extortion rates that the PRT was forced to pony up and almost viritual kleptomania on the part of the board.

    • Sandy Smith

      Thanks for the correction on the date of the mayoral election; that would place the Transit Commissioner’s report blasting Taylor’s plan on engineering grounds in 1916 or 1917, but it does exist; I examined it in the Government Publications section of the Central Library about 20 years ago.

      If you go back and reread my entry for 1903, you will note that I did say the PRT had been created one year earlier.

      Whatever Mitten did that did get implemented did bring about both labor peace and a fairly high level of devotion to him as a manager; the former student union on the Temple University campus bears his name, and PRT employees raised a substantial portion of the funds needed to build it. However, the circumstances of Mitten’s death by drowning at his Poconos retreat the year before work on Mitten (now Memorial) Hall began are somewhat mysterious. For most of the 1920s, the PRT used “Under Mitten Management” as a PR slogan to signal the company was not the widely reviled (by both employees and the riding public) firm that built the Market Street subway-elevated.

      “Extortion rates”: to the City of Philadelphia, I presume, as franchise payments?