Would Rick Santorum Make a Better Candidate Than Corbett?

A pretty compelling argument.

santorum

Keystone Politics’s Jake Sternberger is floating a contrarian theory that arch-conservative Rick Santorum would make a better gubernatorial candidate than the (slightly) more moderate Tom Corbett. Here’s the argument, in a nutshell:

  • He can raise money from eccentric wacko birds like Foster Friess.
  • He can turn out the really right-wing social conservative “man-on-dog” types.
  • He’s a Penn State grad, which makes him not completely hated among all Penn State grads in the state.
  • He affects an economic populism that’s rare among conservatives these days.

 I think there’s some truth to this. There are regular reports of intra-party musing about a Corbett alternative, and he doesn’t seem to have a natural base of support besides the folks in the natural gas industry. His ability to make everyone hate him, as I noted in a piece earlier this year about his relationship to Penn State, is almost masterful. And now he’s become a gaffe-machine. That said, his biggest strength is probably the very status-quo-like vibe about him. If moderate Pennsylvanians for whatever reason get scared off by a SEPA liberal candidate like Allyson Schwartz, Corbett’s going to seem like a safe bet in comparison. No matter how much they don’t like him. Kind of like a certain 2012 presidential candidate.

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.