Steve Cozen Profile: The Inside Man

Whether he’s suing big corporations in disaster cases or Saudi Arabia over 9/11, Steve Cozen has built his career siding with the underdog. Now, with his hands in both casino deals, has the ultimate outsider become the quintessential insider?

“He’s just got these delusions of grandeur,” according to a partner at a competing Philadelphia firm. “He tends to tilt at windmills on some of these cases, and then when the courts don’t agree with him, he goes into these ad hominem attacks on the judges, as if they’re delusional.”

 
For instance, Cozen’s suing the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. No, that’s not a typo. On behalf of insurance companies that paid out $5 billion in claims as a result of 9/11 and on behalf of families of some 9/11 victims, he’s trying to prove that the Saudi sheikhs provided material support to the terrorists. In 2008, a judge threw out the case on jurisdictional grounds, but Cozen told me he felt the judge’s reading of the case was a “perversion” of the relevant law, and now he’s lobbying the U.S. Senate to pass legislation that will allow the case to go forward. (That’s not a typo, either.) In another federal case, in 2004, Cozen sued the government on behalf of the Delaware Nation, a tribal group that was laying claim to 315 acres in the Lehigh Valley to plop down a casino. When a U.S. district judge ruled against his client, Cozen told a reporter, “It is a poorly reasoned, illogical, irrational decision and screams out for an appeal.” (He lost the appeal, too.) Such public criticism of judges by litigators is “considered very bad form,” according to the partner at the competing firm. I asked Cozen if it was bad form to ream out a judge like this, and it was the only time I ever sensed his composure cracking. “I’ve been practicing law for 40 years,” Cozen said. “How many quotes [have you found of me hammering judges]? How many?” His words, high-pitched and clipped, landed like punches. “How many? Anything else? Anything else?”  Then he gave me a list of judges I could call who would testify that he was not, in fact, arrogant.

 
You have to admire the passion and conviction here. Still, a lawyer as tough as Cozen is bound to flirt with the ethical lines, and one time, according to two federal judges, he crossed over.

 
In 1980, the MGM Grand hotel and casino in Las Vegas caught fire, killing 85 people. Cozen was hired by the fire-insurance company. Sometime afterward, Cozen got a call. It was from a lawyer representing an expert witness who was working with MGM to win its case. The expert was offering to turn against MGM and help Cozen win his case by identifying fraud in MGM’s claim — in return for $1 million, according to court records. (Cozen says he doesn’t recall a specific amount.) When MGM found out that its own guy was trying to screw the company over, all hell broke loose, and Cozen was disqualified from the case. He was subsequently cleared of all wrongdoing by the Pennsylvania disciplinary board. But in a 1986 legal opinion, a federal judge, Edward C. Reed Jr., wrote that Cozen had indeed violated Canon 9 of the lawyers’ Code of Professional Responsibility: “The impropriety of attorney Cozen’s participation in the nefarious transaction was manifest.”

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 < Previous Next >View as One Page

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • Anonymous

    Blew off the next possible governor of PA? Wow! I am impressed. What a guy–”best year in their history” AND took on 70 Wolf Blockers without a wobble. Love it! I only take exception to the key players “Mark Alderman” a key player? I guess running a 106 year old law firm into the ground must qualify as a “key player.” The “get” couldn’t be more key except if you ask the folks who lost their jobs, capital contributions, had kids in college, or new babies about what a “key player” Mark Alderman is. Keep congratulating yourself, Steve, you are in good company.

  • Bruce

    So modest they don’t even mention the biggest law suit in Canadian history with its subject matter one of the top 100 disasters in Lloyd’s history, but to them just another fire, but this time up north. If you need the best trial team ever assembled, call Gerb’s, he won’t let Coz blow you off.