Designer Accuses Anthropologie of Selling Copycat Bag (That, It Turns Out, Is Also Made From Cancer-Causing Materials)

Double fail.

Anthro

Image via Forestbound Instagram.

We all love a good David vs. Goliath story, especially when David is a fledgling independent designer and Goliath is a billion dollar retail giant. The latest David to raise arms is Alice Saunders, the designer behind Massachusetts-based bag company Forestbound. Yesterday, Saunders posted to Instagram a side-by-side comparison of one of her bags and one sold by Anthropologie (see above). The similarity of design and font is striking, and the fact that Anthro has previously collaborated with Saunders (and so is obviously aware of her brand and products) dashes any hopes of this being purely coincidental.

But there’s another worrisome detail that no one seems to be talking about. Anthro’s iteration of the ‘Escape’ bag, designed by Nila Anthony, comes with its own health warning – a quick little italicized sentence: “WARNING: This product contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.” 

Um, WHAT

Bag Warning

A screenshot of the bag listing on Anthropologie’s website.

The warning is right under a cheery description of the bag as “a friendly vegan leather reminder to keep the getaways coming.” Friendly? What part of cancer and birth defects is friendly?

The bag is made of polyurethane vegan leather, the Material Formerly Known As Pleather. The use of polyurethane in fashion and accessories isn’t anything new, and it’s widespread. In fact, most synthetic leathers are made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyurethane. (I find it interesting that something labeled ‘vegan’ can contain so many chemicals.) Pleather experienced a grand fashion resurgence back in 2013, thanks to designers like Joseph Altuzarra and Tom Ford. But it’s a material you should probably think twice about: Back in 2010, researchers tested bags made from PVC and discovered “extremely alarming levels of lead in some handbags from top retailers.” Eek.

The warning labels like the one on Anthro’s site are thanks to California’s Proposition 65:

“Labels warning that a product contains compounds that may cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm are now required on many household items sold in California. But people all over the country see them because many companies put the labels on all items that contain these compounds, even if they’re to be sold in other states. The warning labels can be found on many kinds of products, such as electrical wires, jewelry, padlocks, dishes, flashlights, and pesticides, to name just a few.”

So how likely is it that a bag like this will lead to cancer? According to Prop 65 requirements, “The law defines ‘no significant risk’ as a level of exposure that would cause no more than 1 extra case of cancer in 100,000 people over a 70-year lifetime. So a compound can be unlabeled if a person exposed to the substance at the expected level for 70 years is estimated to have a 1 in 100,000 chance or less of getting cancer due to that exposure.”

Though the risk might appear to be slight, I wonder why a company that rakes in over a billion dollars annually would bother to dabble in items that require any warnings in the first place. In fact, why deal with pleather at all?

Lucky for those of you who like the bag, well, there’s another, better, less-risky option out there. (Hi, Forestbound!) It’s proof that sometimes you don’t need to reinvent the wheel. Or, as the case may be, slightly modify it with cheaper materials and pass it off as your own.

Around The Web


Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.