Beautiful Music

Imagine a Rittenhouse Square mansion stuffed with the world’s top musical prodigies. Now imagine you’re one of them, trying to survive round-the-clock rehearsals, barking instructors and the relentless pursuit of perfection. For Becky Anderson and her fellow students, the race to be the best of the best defines life inside the Curtis Institute of Music

THE CURTIS INSTITUTE of Music is the most selective college in America. While Harvard and Yale can be awfully choosy, opening their doors to only about eight percent of applicants, Curtis is twice as hard to get into. The scale is different, of course. The conservatory accepts only enough orchestral instrumentalists to fill out a standard symphony — about 100. In addition, there’s a contingent of pianists, some organists, a few harpsichord players, enough singers to stage full-scale operas, and a smattering of composers and conductors, like Lenny Bernstein. So total enrollment comes to 160, give or take. In any given year, there might be 40 vacancies. Last year, nearly 900 people applied for them.

Besides reputation, there’s one big inducement for that: At Curtis, if you can get in, tuition is free. It has been almost since the school’s founding in 1924, when Mary Louise Curtis Bok used a big chunk of her inheritance from her father Cyrus Curtis’s publishing company (Saturday Evening Post, Ladies’ Home Journal) to purchase those three formidable mansions — one built for the Drexels, another for the Crapps, the third for the Sibleys — and endow a little school whose sole aim was “to train exceptionally gifted young musicians.” Mrs. Bok’s legacy, an unprecedented $12.5 million in pre-Depression dollars now valued at $132 million, helps fund the tuition of each and every student.

 “You cannot pay to go to Curtis,” says Elin Frazier, a fine Philadelphia-based trumpeter who arrived here from Boston in 1960. “You cannot pay to go.” The point of her repetition is that you cannot buy, beg or steal your way in. Though it sometimes happens that the child of a famous musician attends, there are no spots kept open for legacies; the music world needs no George Dubyas. Neither is there a diversity program. “It’s all about how well they perform,” says admissions director Chris Hodges. “Curtis wants the best.”

And it gets them. If Curtis were a place where chefs or fashion designers of such caliber came to train, there would be a reality TV show about it. If the students played basketball at the level they sing and play fiddles and horns, the school would have an endorsement deal with Nike. “I’ve lived in Philly 20 years,” Hodges says. “And I’ve always thought this was one of the greatest unsung treasures in the city. If you were to ask the basic man on the street to name a great music school, they’re probably going to say Juilliard. And they are a great school. But if you were to ask a musician to name a great music school, they very well might say, ‘Curtis Institute.’”

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10< Previous Next >View as One Page

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • Monique

    Great article! To be savoured from beginning to end both for form and content, and the genuine, passionate conviction that it conveys.

  • Gary

    Nice throwaway line on George Bush. Since we all know he was born with a silver spoon. But what about Kennedy legacies? Biden legacies? Did they get into good schools on pure merit? Is that why they needed to cheat and plagiarize? Does that explain the failed bar exams? Maybe the author could stick to the point of his story next time rather than taking cheap shots to ingratiate himself to his presumed we-all-think-the-same-way audience?

  • Dave

    Gary! Amen amen amen! I thought the exact same thing, thanks for saying it better than I could have.

  • Robert

    Why does the writer feel obliged to take a cheap shot at George Bush? God knows he failed us less than the current prez. Other such legacies-Kennedy, Rockefeller, Biden, Bayh, Byrd, Clinton–have done poorly too.

  • Bem

    Does it make the writer feel good to take a shot a W like that OR, is that what’s required to get onto his circle’s party invite list? Whatever the purpose, it ruined the purpose of the article. Nice try though.

  • Roger

    If that’s so good for Curtis, why wouldn’t it be good for other schools, professions, military service, etc, which “want the best”?

  • Juan

    Moronic comments like this about GW are written into the DNA of today’s media. If we want to talk about the intellectual challenges of our Commanders-in-Chief, let’s start with the current one (Mr.Cinco de Cuatro, 57 states, etc.)

  • Gerard

    One reads such cheap shots against a former president in an article concerning a music school in Philadelphis and what can one say but… “Marchese.”

  • Anonymous

    I’m amazed by the stupidity of the comments. Who cares if your boy blunder George ‘W’ was mentioned, oh boy, cry me a river! You just ignored the 10 page article. Grow up boys!