Theresa Santai-Gaffney Strikes Again, Filing an “En Banc” Motion With the Third Circuit Court

theresa santai-gaffney

If at first you don’t succeed, try, and try, and try, and try, and try again. Not a bad matra to live by—unless, of course, you’re Theresa Santai-Gaffney, who seems to be stopping at nothing to make sure we lose our right to marry.

LGBTQ Nation reports that the Schuylkill County register of wills requested an “en banc” hearing by the Third Circuit Court, which means that she wants the entire 14-member bench to decide whether the marriage equality ruling should be appealed. The last time she petitioned the Third Circuit Court only three judges ruled on the motion.

So far, Santai-Gaffney hasn’t had much luck. Earlier this month, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito denied her motion to stop same-sex marriage in Pennsylvania, and before that, the Third Circuit Court of appeals rejected her bid to “gain standing in the case, ‘affirming the District Court’s ruling that “if the highest elected official in the commonwealth chooses to abide by our decision, it defies credulity that we would permit a single citizen to stand in for him to perfect an appeal.’”

Let’s hope this latest motion gets knocked down, too, but something makes me nervous about getting more people in the mix.

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • D Lloyd

    I have been following this since the May 20 decision. Although I’m concerned about equal rights for all, I’m wondering what if any consequence this could have on existing PA same-sex marriages if the appeal is granted and eventually same-sex marriage in PA is reversed.

    • StevesWeb

      In 2008 same sex marriage was briefly legal in California before proposition H8. I am among those married earlier in 2008 while it was legal.

      When the Jesus industry asked the CA courts to nullify marriages like mine they lost because the marriage was legal and was therefore grandfathered.

      • D Lloyd

        Thanks for taking the time to reply with related info. I really appreciate it. Hopefully, if needed, then this CA situation would be a precedent should a similar situation occur in PA. (But again, I sincerely hope it won’t be necessary, and I hope marriage equality is here to stay.)