A Hollow Victory for Philly Schools

City and District win cigarette tax fight, but secure wretched status quo.

Dave Davies nailed it, as he so often does, when he described last week’s surprise deal enabling Philadelphia to tax cigarettes and send the proceeds to the schools as simultaneously “awful” and a “stunning, come-from-behind legislative win.”

The $2-a-pack cigarette tax looked dead right up until Wednesday night, when a surprise amendment offered by State Rep. John Taylor-the lone Republican in Philadelphia’s 34-strong delegation to Harrisburg-won enough support for the initiative to enable it to pass the tax-averse House. 119-90


Considering the alternative, there's little doubt that this was a win for the city (and a reminder that a 100-percent Democratic delegation is clearly not in the city's best interest). Parents, students and educators owe Taylor, the rest of the delegation, Mayor Nutter and Council President Clarke (all of whom lobbied hard for this) their gratitude.

But let's look at what was won.

The city won the right to tax itself even more, picking up slack that has historically been the state's responsibility.

The district won just barely enough funding to enable schools to open in the fall, at the same utterly unacceptably low staffing levels of last year.

That's the big victory. Harrisburg, principally the Republican majority in the House, has moved the goal posts s0 dramatically that this feels like a win for the city. I see a ton of problems with this, but three leap to mind as particularly troublesome.

  1. By authorizing the cigarette tax, the state has probably made it impossible — or at least much more politically difficult —for the SRC and Superintendent Bill Hite to refuse to open schools this fall. While that may seem like an unqualified good thing, the threat of a shutdown is arguably the only leverage the district has to secure more funding. A shutdown would attract national attention, shame those in the state legislature capable of shame, and put tremendous pressure on Gov. Corbett to shake loose more state funding for the schools. Now that option is probably off the table, because the schools have the bare minimum needed to replicate last year's sorry educational offerings.
  2. Last year stretched city schools to the breaking point. We're headed for a re-run, and the risks are compounding. Talented educators who told themselves last year to wait it out may well flee the district rather than deal with the deprivation again. Even worse, by repeating last year's experience, we risk creating a new, utterly unacceptable status quo, where it's the new normal to have schools without counselors, or aides or librarians. In that environment, simply restoring state funding to pre-Corbett, pre-recession 2008-2009 levels starts to look like extra funding, instead of simply making good on what's been taken away. That is an even harder political sell.
  3. The last few budget cycles have probably permanently reallocated the split between the state and city when it comes to funding of Philadelphia schools. The city is a huge loser in this realignment, with major consequences for the city's ability to lower tax rates or invest in municipal services. This wouldn't be so bad if the additional city spending on schools was being used to actually enhance education; that would be a great investment in the Philadelphia's future. But it's not. Instead, the cash is being used to just to staunch the worst of the bleeding created by the feds and Harrisburg, who have bailed on the school district in a big way. See the chart above, which shows pretty clearly that the city is picking up all the slack.

Some victory.

Part of the problem seems to be that too many representatives and senators plainly do not understand why the district is broke. According to John Baer, Philly Rep. Angel Cruz was calling for an audit of the school district next week. "Something is not working with the school district's finances, and it's imperative we find out what it is and fix it before we pour more money into the district," Cruz said.

Where to begin with this amazingly-commonplace-sentiment? It's as though state lawmakers can't understand why Philly schools are broke when they get more money than other, much-smaller districts with far-less-challenged kids. "Upper Merion is doing ok," you'll hear. "What's wrong with Philly?" I seriously think these guys need to revisit the concept of the denominator.

It's actually not much of a mystery why the district is broke. Funding has been reduced. District pension costs-which are controlled by the state-are skyrocketing. The debt load from past mismanagement is crippling. And rapid charter expansion has made it hard for the district to shed operational costs as quickly as it loses students, which is another problem the state is well-positioned to help solve. Are some district dollars being squandered? No doubt. That's true of all big bureaucracies. But the cuts have been dramatic, and I think the evidence largely suggests that most of the district's excesses are in the past.

Some city Democrats have fooled themselves into thinking all of this will get much, much better if Corbett is defeated in the fall. That's delusional, I'm afraid. The Republican-led House of Representatives won't be changing its stripes, no matter who is governor. The right-wing core of the House melds Cruz-style willful ignorance with fervent opposition to tax increases and a not-so-subtle disdain for all-things-Philly. This group isn't going to roll over for a Governor Wolf.

Still, last week's vote on the cigarette tax showed that that unreasonable GOP core can be beaten, particularly with help from suburban Republicans. Senate leader Dominic Pileggi has made it clear that city schools can get a fair shake in his chamber. The problem is the House. Last week, House leadership bent, ever so slightly. The city, the district and their allies have another year to figure out how to do make them do it again.

Follow @PKerkstra on Twitter.

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • Charliefoxtrot

    We could add a billion dollars a year to tge district and see very little increase in grade scores. The district is in the biz of babysitting, with exceptions like Masterman.
    You cannot look to Upper Merion as a funding goal when the culture that feeds most of the Philly schools is itself broken. Nothing will change that. Successful schools reflect the culture which the school draws from….the school $ spent in Upper Merion and the grades achieved is a reflection if successful culture-*****not necessarily a result of more funding***.

    Meaning that driven poor kids of any color coming from stable two parent households not on public assistance will shine no matter how little money is spent, the reverse is true as well. The rest is babysitting.

    • Tracer Bullet

      So anyone who’s family doesn’t look like the Cleavers or the Cosbys is just SOL?

      • Charliefoxtrot

        Statistically, yes. You cannot raise kids of any color without stable working parents and expect them to succeed. But that should be obvious. Exceptions abound, of course.

  • Bob Dobolino

    Most kids have no interest in being in school in Philadelphia, and their parents don’t either. What little they do learn is communist indoctrination and life-lessons in perpetuating poverty while living on the public dime. Let the users pay for the system. Let the property owner stop paying for this garbage.

  • poyski

    Lower Merion has the money to have some of the best schools in the area. The city line is much more than a line. It is a cultural divide as big as the Grand Canyon. When will Philadelphia finally give a sh!^ about its people. The people need to have responsive government. Vote the bums out and bring in community activists!

  • linda

    Really? Did you poll the kids and ask them about wanting to be in school? I don’t think that could be further from the truth. I’ve worked with hundreds of Philly school kids for the past 10 years and they do, in fact, want to learn and go far in life. Many are very bright, most are well behaved. Bad neighborhood, good neighborhood, they want to learn and grow and explore and do what’s right. Yes, there are some kids out there on a bad path, but almost any kid can be turned around with the right teachers and influence in their life. Just because there are some parents who don’t care, that doesn’t mean the kids have to be written off or suffer–or the whole district, for pete’s sake. Bad parents happen in the ‘burbs too! Also, there are many, many good parents, caring parents in bad neighborhoods. I’m so tired of the generalizing that goes on about Philly school district kids and families. There are over 200 schools in the district, it’s way more diverse, involved and filled with great kids and parents that most people realize! Unless you get in the schools (more than one or two schools please so you can truly see the range), than please just stop. Stop the BS and armchair critics, these are kids, real people, you’re talking about.