Pennsylvania legislators advanced three controversial bills yesterday involving gun rights, sanctuary cities and police transparency. Read more »
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday against a law that allowed gun owners and the National Rifle Association to sue local municipalities for their gun-control rules.
The court nixed Act 192, which allowed gun owners and organizations to challenge law regardless of whether or not it had directly affected or harmed them. It also allowed for the NRA and similar organizations to provide compensation for attorney fees in such cases.
We already know Congress probably won’t enact stricter gun laws in the wake of the worst mass shooting in United States history. It did nothing after Adam Lanza murdered 20 elementary schoolers in 2012, after all; it’s hard to imagine what could be a catalyst for change if that wasn’t. But what about Pennsylvania? Is there a chance the General Assembly will starting requiring background checks for private gun sales, or ensure that it takes residents longer than five minutes to buy the Orlando shooter’s gun of choice, an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle?
Gun control advocates: Sorry, but nope. Not happening. Not under this state legislature.
Gun lovers: Despite what you may have heard, you’ve got nothing to worry about!
The National Rifle Association has a friend in Pennsylvania’s GOP-controlled General Assembly. In its regular “report cards” for lawmakers, the lobbying group gave Republican House Speaker Mike Turzai a perfect grade of A+, Republican House Majority Leader Dave Reed an A, and Republican House Majority Whip Bryan Cutler an A, according to VoteSmart.org’s database of NRA scores. Republican Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman got an A+ and Republican Senate Whip John Gordner got an A, as well.
The National Rifle Association is not happy with Comcast after the cable giant asked the group to censor images of guns from its TV commercials for the Great American Outdoor Show.
The Outdoor Show is held February 6-12 in Harrisburg, Pa., and is billed as “an NRA country jam” celebrating hunting, fishing and the outdoors. It’s run by the NRA who submitted two 30-second ads to Comcast but didn’t take too kindly to an email back saying it needed to “remove any and all images of rifles, shooting ranges, and hand guns” before the ads could be evaluated for approval. Read more »
If at first you don’t succeed…
A Republican legislator is trying to revive a bill that would allow third-party organizations like to NRA to sue Pennsylvania towns and cities for having overly restrictive gun laws. An earlier version of the law was struck down in March by a Commonwealth Court panel that said the legislature had passed the bill in an unconstitutionally opaque fashion.
“The court’s decision was based merely on technical procedural rules, meaning that the substance of the legislation itself was never called into question,” Rep. Mark Keller, a Republican from South Central Pennsylvania, said in a memorandum to colleagues. Read more »
A Commonwealth Court has struck down the new state law that let the NRA — and other third parties — sue Pennsylvania cities for their gun restrictions.
The law is “unconstitutional and void,” the court said in Thursday morning’s ruling. Read more »
Judges in Pittsburgh on Wednesday heard a challenge to a new state law that lets third-party groups like the NRA sue cities if their gun ordinances are more restrictive than state law.
The law’s challengers, including Sen. Daylin Leach of Montgomery County, contend that it was passed improperly: The state constitution requires legislative bills to be about a single subject; the gun bill was passed, though, by inserting its language in a bill originally concerning scrap metal theft. Read more »
Do you have a gun? Do you think I have a gun? Most media reports would have you believe that ever since President Obama’s election, we Americans have been arming ourselves to the teeth. But a new survey by the well-respected, independent research organization NORC shows just the opposite. Only 22 percent of us today own guns, down from 31 percent in 1985. So come out of that bunker. The NRA’s desperate efforts to overturn gun-control ordinances in cities like Lancaster and Pittsburgh and Philadelphia are the death throes of a lobbying bully that knows its time is coming to an end. For which citizens from Newtown, Connecticut, to Aurora, Colorado, gratefully say: Amen.
As promised, the National Rifle Association has filed suit against the City of Philadelphia for “for refusing to comply with a state law that prohibits local governments from enacting gun control ordinances,” according to a statement from the organization today.
The organization is filing suit against Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Lancaster under the provisions of House Bill 80, which was signed into law in Harrisburg last year and allows membership organizations to sue municipalities where gun regulations are more restrictive than state law. “The cities of Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and Lancaster have openly defied state law for decades. They continue to willfully violate the law and insist on politically grandstanding at taxpayers’ expense,” Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative said in the statement.
The suit has just posted in the Philadelphia court system. We present it below as a public service. Stay tuned for more.
A new law that allows third parties to sue Pennsylvania cities for having restrictive gun ordinances — even if they suffered no personal harm — has been used as the basis for a new lawsuit against the City of Harrisburg.