Blatstein’s McIlhenny Mansion Renovations Get Thumbs Up From Historical Commission

mcilhenny mansion

Photo by Bradley Maule for Hidden City.

Last week the Philadelphia Historical Commission considered building changes requested by developer Bart Blatstein, who bought Rittenhouse Square’s long vacant McIlhenny Mansion in April as a personal residence. According to PlanPhilly, “the Blatstein case was considered from two vantages:”

whether the changes he was requesting were merely “alterations” or if they constituted “demolition” of historic fabric; and whether the design of the new building is compatible with the overall historic district.

The first issue has been raised before when the former owner of the mansion petitioned the commission to make changes in 1999. Most members of the commission (including, as PlanPhilly put it, “newly-bearded” chair Sam Sherman) felt their approval from that time could apply now.

As for the latter concern, Blatstein’s architects explicated the design changes they were planning to make, and the commission requested some minor alterations. But the design in concept was unanimously approved. Apparently, Blatstein didn’t talk much — nor did he need to. The most inadvertently funny line from the PlanPhilly piece:

Blatstein was present with a coterie of dark-suited men, but remained silent through the testimony.

You and your coteries, Bart.

Blatstein wins Historical Commission approval on mansion renovations [PlanPhilly]

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • z2

    side rant – why can’t Philly’s historical commission and architectural committee post agendas and minutes in a timely fashion??? The last set of minutes for the historical commission is from March 2013 and the architectural commission is up to April.

    And, why can’t they post previous minutes/agendas for the sake of – ummmm historical record?? Posting documents from the only past few months is not helpful. get with the times!!