Ethics Board Aims to Clamp Down on Campaign Spending Loopholes

Dealing with the realities of a post–Citizens United world.

Looking ahead to the 2015 mayoral campaign, the Board of Ethics met yesterday to hash out a series of proposed changes to the city’s campaign-finance regulations.

According to the Inky’s Heard in the Hall blog, the board is seeking to clarify what counts as a campaign contribution in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which paved the way for unlimited corporate, nonprofit, and union donations in support of — but not directly to or in concert with — candidates.




Among the changes on the table:

• Republication of campaign material would be considered a coordinated effort between donor and campaign and therefore subject to contribution limits.

• Campaign material provided to a third party, including websites such as YouTube, by the candidate would be considered consent for republication (and therefore, subject to the republication provisions).

• Republication would not be considered an in-kind contribution if the material is used against the candidate “that prepared the material.”

Attack-ad producers are breathing a sigh of relief at that last one.

A public hearing on the new regulations is scheduled for September 7th.

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.