Chris Christie Somehow Involved in Second Bridge Scandal

At issue is diverted Port Authority funding being used to repair the Pulaski Skyway, which is owned by the State of New Jersey.

AP Photo | Mel Evans

AP Photo | Mel Evans

Chris Christie is being investigated in a second bridge scandal, according to a report from the New York Times. The investigation — which the Times sourced to “people briefed on the matter” — centers on renovations to the Pulaski Skyway.

The Skyway, which opened in 1932, is notoriously unreliable. (“Unpredictable traffic congestion and its functionally obsolete design makes the Skyway one of the most unreliable roads in the United States,” Wikipedia helpfully notes.) The bridge closed to Northbound traffic as part of a massive overhaul in April. In 2010 and 2011, Christie wanted to use Port Authority money for repairs on the obsolete bridge. The problem? The Port Authority doesn’t own the bridge, the state does, and so it couldn’t.

But Christie persisted, and the authority justified the use of the money by calling the Skyway an access route to the Lincoln Tunnel. The Skyway actually connects to the Holland Tunnel, which is not eligible for Port Authority funds. The money for Skyway repairs was coming from the $3 billion in Port Authority money freed up when Christie killed the ARC trans-Hudson tunnel project in 2010.

Here’s how Christie could be in trouble, per the Times:

In bond documents describing the Skyway reconstruction and other repairs, the Port Authority has called the projects “Lincoln Tunnel Access Infrastructure Improvements.”

The accuracy of this characterization is now a major focus of the investigations, according to several people briefed on the matter. Under a New York State law known as the Martin Act, prosecutors can bring felony charges for intentionally deceiving bond holders, without having to prove any intent to defraud or even establish that any fraud occurred.

Lawyers with the Port Authority expressed concern with how the money was being spent. Transportation experts say most motorists do not use the Skyway (and three other New Jersey roads being repaired with Port Authority funding) as an access route to the Lincoln Tunnel.

[NYT | The Record | The Star-Ledger]

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • Bridgegate Part Deux

    Oh Philly Mag, you did not just cite Wikipedia as a source for this article? At the very least cite the reference from the Wikipedia article, my god.

    • Donald Sterling

      McQuade is the new Jayson Blair, following in the infamous footsteps of Jayhawk Joel Mathis and Viktor Fiorillo

      This is not reporting.

      This is not journalism

      Its a cut and paste job of epic proportions — links, wikipedia and no real insight or analysis from Danno.

      McQuade can do better than this

      So can this publication

      • guest

        Why do you read it? You literally just ripped on 3 of the 4 people that work in the N&O section of PhillyMag. Yet you come and read these articles.

        Your comment, and your position on this, are as stupid as your handle.

      • A friend

        False. Check out the links at the bottom. This is a news aggregate — the hard hitting news stories are linked to at the bottom. McQuade is just paraphrasing for the likes of us who don’t want to do the digging.

        That’s hardly Blair-style fabrications.

        • billmedicare

          It is left winger libtuerd media idiot

    • guest

      You’re kidding me right? You took the time to create an account just to comment on this? He didn’t cite Wikipedia for facts. He threw in an opinion statement. And he put it in parentheses. It was a quick aside to show that this bridge is commonly known as being unreliable.

      There isn’t any fact there for him to cite the reference from the Wikipedia article.

      Chill the F out. My god.

      • Bridgegate Part Deux

        Well…actually, it’s a news article, so the author’s opinion should have no part in the story. So by referencing Wikipedia to prove his point that the skyway is “notoriously unreliable” is poor journalism. Also, if there is no “reference” for that fact in Wikipedia, why is he citing it as a source? It’s lazy.

        • A friend

          It’s not the “author’s opinion” it’s the Wikipedia posters opinion.

  • billmedicare

    Libtuerd media just chomps at the bit to burry and republican they can don’t they? Such a sad pathetic world these liberals must live in