Defense Lawyer Seeks Recusal of Every Judge in Philly

Suggests PA Justice Seamus McCaffery, who is suing Inky, is too connected locally for defendants to get fair trial.

A defense lawyer in Seamus McCaffery’s lawsuit against the Philadelphia Inquirer is asking that every judge in Philadelphia be recused from the case.

Richard Sprague, lawyer for Intertrust GCN, a company owned by Inky co-owner Lewis Katz, filed the motion Friday (below). In it, he notes that McCaffery — now a justice on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court — was previously a judge in the First Judicial District that Philadelphia, between 1993 and 2003, and has since participated in judicial reform efforts here. McCaffery’s brother, Daniel, is currently a judge in the district.

Sprague cited other ties between McCaffery, his wife, and the Philadelphia courts — ties, he said, that would undermine public confidence unless the case were assigned to a judge from outside the county.

“Because of the foregoing ties to the First Judicial District, the recusal of the entire Philadelphia County bench, and the assignment to an out-of-county judge to preside over the instant matter, are warranted,” Sprague wrote.

Other parties in the case have until April 7th to respond to Sprague’s motion.

McCaffery and his wife filed notice earlier this month of his intention to sue the Inquirer. That followed articles in 2013 that detailed how McCaffery’s wife and chief judicial aide, Lise Rapaport, received fees for steering cases to personal injury firms — and that in eight of 11 appeals, McCaffery voted for the position favored by the firms that had paid Rapaport in other cases. (In at least one of the cases, Rapaport was running McCaffery’s Supreme Court election campaign at the time she made the referral.) Sprague said in his motion that he believes that at least eight Philadelphia firms were connected to those referral fees.

The reporting also quoted legal experts saying McCaffery should’ve disclosed the payments or even recused himself from the cases.

After the articles appeared, the court adopted rules prohibiting judges from hiring relatives or sitting on corporate boards. The articles also prompted an FBI investigation, McCaffery acknowledged. In court filings, however, he has asserted that he has done “nothing wrong, illegal, or unethical.” His lawyer, Dion Rassias, has suggested the Inquirer’s legal experts might’ve offered differing assessments if they’d been provided different information about the cases by the newspaper.

McCaffery and his wife have not filed an official complaint specifying the Inquirer’s wrongdoing. The newspaper last week asked a judge to require McCaffery and Rapaport to do so, or see the case dismissed. Rassias responded with a motion asking the Inquirer to name the 11 firms mentioned in its reporting.

A hearing to determine how the case will proceed is scheduled for Wednesday afternoon at City Hall.

The defendants in the case are Interstate General Media, which owns the paper; Intertrust GCN, the company owned by Lewis Katz, a minority shareholder in IGM; Inky editor Bill Marimow and reporter Craig McCoy; Daily News editor Michael Days; and Inky editorial cartoonist Signe Wilkinson.

Follow @JoelMMathis on Twitter.

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • matthew brandley

    Move a judge from erie pa down to philly. Maybe he can be impartial but then again the lefties at the inky have so many ynderground feeders anymore anything is possible at that corrupt rat hole

  • wildmother

    I was told by several law firms they never took cases in Philly because the judges were all corrupt.

  • 14justice

    They are corrupt….and there is no investigative unit that cares to expose it…I’ve tried.
    So…then every judge gets to rule on themselves whether they recuse themselves ..or not. I am dealing with the same kind of problem….the motion to recuse is ruled on by the same judge you want recused.
    Anybody want to work with me to help change this law??
    A Change of Venue motion is needed…I have been dealing with the same problems in Philadelphia…but my children keep getting abused because of the political connections my ex has and the judge who won’t recuse. This judge is guilty for allowing the abuse to continue.