Jennifer Weiner v. Jonathan Franzen, Vol. III

The literary war rages on.

New York Times best-selling author Jennifer Weiner


First, Jonathan Franzen wrote a lengthy diatribe against Twitter and its adherents, especially bemoaning the “Jennifer Weiner-ish self-promotion” the web breeds. Then, Weiner fired back with an essay of her own. THEN, it seems Franzen subtly called Weiner out without identifying her–we call this a “sub-tweet,” Jonathan– telling an interviewer, “I can’t stop writing and disappear just because someone chooses to project onto me her grievance with a million years of sexist human history.”

NOW, the Philadelphia-based chick lit queen has re-loaded and fired back again. Here’s what she told Salon.

Of course, I have no way of knowing if this is directed at me — and if you look at what I’ve said over the years, it’s been more about the Times as an institution and Sam Tanenhaus as a gatekeeper than JF. He’s more the beneficiary of a sexist system than its architect. However, in terms of what he’s done with his power, I think you can draw a very explicit causal relationship between his ’01 diss of Oprah and her choice to shutter the book club. Post-CORRECTIONS, Oprah never picked another debut female novelist…and the only female writers she talked about were Toni Morrison and Pearl S. Buck. He owns some of that.

I appreciate that he’s acknowledged that too many books get dismissed as chick lit, and that he’s championed Paula Fox, among others. But he can’t rail about Jennifer Weiner-ish self-promotion without acknowledging that, thanks in some part to his dealings with Oprah, social media is one of the things women writers have been forced to use to get the kind of attention he takes for granted. He has benefited tremendously from a system built on double standards, where a woman has to work twice as hard to be acknowledged as his peer, and he single-handedly eliminated one of the few routes women writers had to getting the kind of press he gets just by opening his mouth. His hands aren’t as clean as he’d like to believe.

This is at heart nothing if not a Philadelphia story. Punchy local underdog keeping up blow-for-blow with world-historical-high-fallutin’ Pultizer winner. Please don’t let this end.

Around The Web

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • ErShava

    White women are so oppressed in America is sad

  • Ronald Fischman

    I’m as disappointed as every other author about the (apparently) gender-related end of Oprah’s Book Club. That having been said, Franzen has been a notoriously sensitive person in his public persona. I, for one, am happy that a local author got some play out of this.

  • GoatBlood

    This is a perfect and hilarious example of “Jennifer-Weinerish self-promotion.”

  • ci0616

    I fail to see the connection between his reluctance to be part of Oprah’s book club and the plight of the female author. People who attack Franzen never seem to be able to knock his work (or read it, so I suspect).

  • Claudia

    I can’t at all see what Franzen’s hesitation to become an Oprah pick has to do with her choices made later with regard to her book club. As a long time reader of Franzen I admire his skill and intellect and agree with his feelings about social media, especially Twitter which is used like bumper sticker snark. I am a 63-year-old woman, writer and the editor in chief of a literary journal. I love nothing more than reading thoughtful, well written essays. Spare me the smack down that is spread by Twitter.