George W. Bush Has a New Library, but the Same, Terrible Old Record

He was still a really horrible president.

No, really: George W. Bush really was a horrible president.

This week brings us the dedication of Bush’s presidential library, along with the latest in a never-ending series of efforts to restore his reputation among the public at large. George W. Bush is smarter than you, we’re told. George W. Bush is a truly good man, we’re told. George W. Bush is a man of great character, we’re told.

The result of all this propaganda, apparently, is that Bush is getting almost popular—he has an approval rating of 47 percent. That’s nearly double what it was, oh, the last two or three years he was in office. Which means we’re forgetting something.

We’re forgetting that George W. Bush really was a horrible president.

Believe it or not, I can almost feel sorry for him about this. If he’d been president during the Clinton years—between the end of the Cold War and the beginning of the 9/11 era—it’s possible that he would’ve avoided enough history to be as fondly remembered as, well, Bill Clinton.

The problem is Bush made a series of discrete choices, any one of which should at least bring a frown from the historians he talks about so much. Here are five things Bush did wrong.

• George W. Bush exploded the deficit. Remember, when Bush arrived in office, there was a budget surplus. He could’ve used that money to shore up the solvency of Social Security—remember Al Gore’s “lockbox”—or maybe offered a modest boost to the economy in the form of a stimulus while still keeping some dough squirreled away for a rainy day. Instead, he merely slashed taxes, sent everybody a big check … and put the government in hock when the economy turned south.

These days, Republicans act as though debts and deficits will kill the country. Back then, though, they just didn’t care. “You know, Paul, Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter,” Vice President Dick Cheney said in 2002 to a colleague concerned about the new deficit. “We won the mid-term elections, this is our due.” There was a $128 billion surplus when Bush took office; there was more than $10 trillion in debt when he left.

George W. Bush created an entitlement without paying for it. Remember the Medicare Drug Benefit? It’s not such a bad program, as such, but there are a couple of notable things about it. First, Bush pushed it in 2003 in order to line up the support of elderly voters in the 2004 election. Second, he didn’t pay for it; the money came from deficit spending. He stuck America with the bill for his re-election, in other words.

At the very least, that’s a cynical act. And that’s the best you can say about it, actually. Republicans supposedly don’t like entitlements or deficits; in one fell swoop, Bush gave us more of both so he could beat John Kerry at the polls.

• George W. Bush invaded Iraq. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The war, which has and will cost us trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, was a horrific mistake, perhaps the worst foreign-policy blunder in American history.

George W. Bush tortured. You can almost give him a pass on this because 9/11 was devastating. The thought of another attack—perhaps nuclear or chemical—must have been terrorizing. But in the end, Bush approved torture. That violated American values going back to George Washington, and it muddied America’s name throughout the rest of the world. And he did so as part of a broader approach to governing that says if the president does it, in wartime at least, it’s not illegal.

George W. Bush trampled the civil rights of gays to get re-elected. You may remember that 11 states held referenda in 2004 to decide whether gays could get married. Gay marriage lost all 11 times. It was part of the Bush re-election plan, an effort to get conservatives out to the polls in a close, tense election year. It worked. And because of that, Bush may someday be remembered as the George Wallace of the gay rights movement. Trouble is, plenty of other politicians probably deserve that label as well.

I got to five before even talking about New Orleans. Or the fact that the economy cratered under his watch, and it’s been President Obama who had to try to dig out.

Let me try to be fair to Bush: He did more than any other president to end the AIDS epidemic in Africa. He seemed to be the rare Republican who actually did care about black people—Kanye notwithstanding—and included them easily in his cabinet in something much more than a token role. He’s not a monster, exactly. He just was not a good president.

When Andrew Breitbart died last year, a conservative friend advised me Breitbart—behind the scenes—was actually a swell guy, generous to friends and family. My response: Who cares?

So it is with Bush. He’s smart? He’s nice? Who cares? His public service was a disaster. That’s how it deserves to be remembered.

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • disqus_GVv6Lpm5ia

    Please let me know what torture you feel is wrong? The torture he approved lead to the capture and death of Bin Laden. The current president is taking credit for Ben Laden while at the same time apologizing for the same acts. Can’t have it both ways. Your current president has been running a propaganda campaign for since being nominated. He should start leading and stop trying to make sure he is popular.

    • Dick_Wolf

      If torture is ok, why aren’t Americans accused of capital crimes tortured to get them to admit their guilt? Probably because the whole point of this country is we are better than that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=571634606 Joel Mathis

    Hello, commenter. I think George W. Bush is a bad president on his own merits, without comparing to the current president. But if you must: Some reasons the current president disappoints me is where he most closely emulates the Bush approach.

    I think it’s pretty massively disputed whether torture really led to the capture of Bin Laden. What’s not really in dispute is that it was torture, and that torture is illegal.

    • Dick_Wolf

      “Some reasons the current president disappoints me is where he most closely emulates the Bush approach.” – This.

      The simple fact that people have remained illegally in a jail cell in Cuba without any trial, lawyer or even formal charges is the most disappointing.

      And before someone points out to me that they are suspected terrorists, the US doesn’t do “suspected.” The US does allegedly guilty of a crime, trial for said crime and verdict.

      • J.Oz

        The contradiction is driven by the enormous risk and it’s unfortunate. It will no doubt be regrettable in some individual cases. The capabilities of the US Intelligence community are 2nd only to China. The vast majority of detainees deserve to be there. If you don’t get that, you don’t get the weight and complexity of the problem. If releasing the detainees increases the risk of attacks, even slightly, that’s UNACCEPTABLE as your and my loved ones are ever increasingly exposed to terror threats.

        • Dick_Wolf

          The vast majority of detainees deserve to be there. – This

          So for the minority that are 100 percent innocent, your and my loved ones are more important than that person who is someone’s son, brother, husband or father? If they happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, too bad? Again, WE are supposed to be better than that. All Gitmo does is serve as another rallying cry, along with dropping drone bombs on whomever we please. Try them in court and if they are found guilty, convict them. Otherwise, it’s a gulag. It’s a Japanese internment camp.

          • J.Oz

            Yes.

  • Dick_Wolf

    Is that the same Bin Laden Bush promised to hunt the ends of the Earth for before starting a war in Iraq to get back at Hussein for threatening his dada? Is that the same Bin Laden, Bush and his team were warned about repeatedly the moment he took office? The Bin Laden that Richard Clarke and the previous administration were obsessive about finding but John Ashcroft and Chaney didn’t feel was a threat?

    Stop. Please. The man literally failed at every job he has had and was bailed out by his daddy. Unfortunately for the American people, 3000 9/11 victims and countless soldiers who never returned home from a fabricated war, his daddy couldn’t fix his presidency.

    Obama is no treat and has been very disappointing, but Bush Jr. is in the conversation for worst American presidents in the history of the country.

  • J.Oz

    Joel…a take from a libertarian fiscally conservative registered Republican.

    - “Bush really was a horrible president” – AGREED.

    - “George W. Bush exploded the deficit” – AGREED…you need to be just as direct on this topic with Obama – FACT: fiscal conservatives are NOT Bush fans. There may NOT be a Big Government guy bigger than Dick Cheney.

    - “George W. Bush invaded Iraq” – AGREED. It’s unforgivable.

    - “George W. Bush created an entitlement without paying for it” – AGREED. Similar to Obama Care but on a much smaller scale.

    - “George W. Bush tortured” – TRUE. Forgivable given the horror of 9/11. In the end, cooler heads have prevailed – GOD BLESS AMERICA.

    - “George W. Bush trampled the civil rights of gays to get re-elected” – DISAGREE. “Trampled” civil rights…drama, hyperbole, and undeserving of further comment – see “states” in your drivel.

    We agree on 2/3rds, a landslide…you and Bush have something in common. You are both smarter that you appear.

  • J.Oz

    Hey Joel…post you’re two cents on Pigford. No €@||$…

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=571634606 Joel Mathis

      Why?

      • J.Oz

        Ummm…I’m interested.

  • Vincent Gaitley

    Iraq is not even close to the worst foreign policy blunder. The several wars with Mexico are worse, as was the abandonment of neutrality and entry into WW 1. We are still suffering from both a century later.