Joseph Amendola—the attorney representing Jerry Sandusky—argued in court (again) Wednesday that the charges against his client stem from accounts that are either too vague or based on unidentified victims and, thus, should be thrown out. A Widener University law professor who has been following the case closely says that Amendola presented legitimate arguments and that it’s possible that victims 2, 6 and 8 could be gone from the case. [Philly.com]
- News: ‘Wedding Crasher’ Thief Pleads Guilty
- News: Jerry Sandusky’s Wife to Speak About Sex Abuse Case for First Time
- News: Mom, Who Accused Police of Assault, Arrested for Shoplifting
- News: Penn State Trustee Resigns, Regrets Paterno Firing
- News: Did PSU Run Up the Score to Beat the Spread?
- News: Slate of Candidates Emerges for Penn State Alumni Election