Joseph Amendola—the attorney representing Jerry Sandusky—argued in court (again) Wednesday that the charges against his client stem from accounts that are either too vague or based on unidentified victims and, thus, should be thrown out. A Widener University law professor who has been following the case closely says that Amendola presented legitimate arguments and that it’s possible that victims 2, 6 and 8 could be gone from the case. [Philly.com]
- News: Philadelphia 7-Eleven Robbed With AK-47 Style Rifle
- G Philly: Preliminary Hearing Set for Gay-Bashing Suspects
- News: WATCH: Don Tollefson Talks About Guilty Plea
- News: America’s Worst City for Bike Thefts
- News: (UPDATE) Tollefson Expected to Plead Guilty
- News: 59 Narcotics Cases Dropped in Police Corruption Case
Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.