Mathis Eyeing New Deal

NFL: San Diego Chargers at Philadelphia Eagles
ORLANDO, Fla. — Evan Mathis
would like a new contract and the Eagles are open to moving him. Sound familiar?

Right before the hour-long sit-down with Chip Kelly at the owners meeting this morning, with the DeSean Jackson trade talk on top of everyone’s mind, Ian Rapoport reported that Mathis wants a raise and that the Eagles, in turn, have made it known that the guard is available via trade. A league source confirmed the report.

The 32-year-old has three years remaining on his deal and is scheduled to make a base salary of $5 million this season.




If Mathis is in fact clamoring for a new contract, he hasn't spoken to Kelly directly, the coach said.

"I think that's just the nature of what our league is like. In professional sports there is a short amount of time that guys have to play this game and they're trying to get what they can, and I certainly understand where they're coming from. And part of being the general manager, cap people, is fitting that all together," said Kelly.

"Do I worry about Evan? No. Evan, you talk about go-to-work lunch pail mentality, that's Evan Mathis. I don't worry about Evan from that standpoint."

A trade makes little sense for either party. Mathis was somewhat of a journeyman before finding success in Philadelphia. He has since built a reputation as one of the premiere guards in the league. He seems particularly fond of this coaching and training staff, is an advocate for the sports science initiatives, and is part of a tightly-knit offensive line group. And why would the Eagles want to move on from him? He has started 47 of a possible 48 games since being signed in 2011 and is coming off a first-team All-Pro campaign.

This could very well be posturing on both sides.

"Evan has been since Day 1 since I got here, just outstanding, whether it's in the meeting rooms, in the weight room, on the practice field -- he practices every day. He may have played the most snaps in the league last year...I don't worry about the player. But I don't think there's one player in the league that will say, 'Nope, I'm good. I don't need anything else.' But they don't bring that to work."

Or he doesn't anticipate that Mathis will, at least.

 

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • Will

    Well next the Eagles will be trying to trade Mathis, Jackson and McCoy for picks….

    • ztom6

      this time next year they just might be.

  • Richard Colton

    The Mathis rumor is to make people forget about Jackson
    The Jackson rumor was to make us stop talking about Byrd
    The failure to sign a top flight safety was to make us move on from Monica Lewinsky
    And the invasion of Grenada was to distract us from Iran-Contra

    These aren’t the droids you’re looking for…

    • Kevin

      I could do with all of these “disturbances in the force” for while though. Next we are going to find out that Chip is really Nick’s father.

    • Explorer51

      You can go about your business…move along…

    • Andy

      These aren’t the droids we’re looking for.

    • Will

      Is it raining draft picks…yet…lol…

    • Jerry Pomroy

      Makes sense. I mean would it have just come out now. The league year has been open a while now. If Mathis was making a stink, we would’ve heard of it right after they extended Peters, not right now. I’m sure he probably does want something at 32. Maybe just some more up front money. I can’t see it being so unrealistic that we’d openly trade him without even a glimmer of a replacement waiting in the wings.

  • Brandon Boykin, LOL

    Foles better tread lightly this time next year…

    • Richard Colton

      better not ask for anything over the minimum

      • dnabrice

        Chip was banking on keeping Foles over paying for Byrd. Though after hearing Lurie’s comments, it sounded like Chip didn’t think Byrd was worth paying for. Didn’t work hard enough in college.

    • http://abigbuttandasmile.com/ A Big Butt and a Smile

      Foles contract (assuming he plays well) will be based on other QB contracts. If the current crop of contract negotiates (kaep, smith, dalton, cam) get 18 mil…well Foles agent will be a damn fool to aske for less.

      If they Ealges balk. He should tell them to kiss his Napoleon Dynamite looking @ss.

    • devCal

      close the garage door…

  • Will

    Boy you ain’t kidding there with Foles….

  • ochospantalones

    THUG! Cut MEthis NOW!!!

    • https://www.skinnypost.com/ GayleSaunders

      Someone probably stole $250,000 dollars out of Mathis home too. Someone really needs to call Inspector Gadget.

      • Jerry Pomroy

        He’s on the case Chief…

      • Amar (India)

        It was probably Nick Foles. He’s the one who won’t get a new contract till next year.

        • https://www.skinnypost.com/ GayleSaunders

          It’s crazy how much Foles is making this season…bargain basement prices. That’s why I’m surprised they aren’t utilizing that extra dough on vital upgrade pieces.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            But committing big dollars elsewhere takes away from potential big dollars to pay Foles, unless you can cram all that salary into the back end of those deals. But even still those guys want big signing bonuses. Which hinders you up front.

          • https://www.skinnypost.com/ GayleSaunders

            Well…are we sure Foles is Chips guy is the question. He may be the fan bases guy, but I’m not sold on Kelly’s faithful love to Foles YET. Well Jerry get me some of those back loaded deals :) I think we at least should have brought in a veteran edge rusher by now.

    • Caught Red Hernandez

      How dare he even think about getting paid adequately based on being one of the best in the league at his position?!

      We better trade him for a draft pick that might be a complete bust or better yet RELEASE him outright!!

    • FMWarner

      Wow, for a second there I thought I was on PFT!

      • ochospantalones

        That’s the vibe I was going for. I have no idea why they think changing people’s names is so funny.

        • FMWarner

          I have no idea why they think anything they do is so funny. That place makes this place look like the Algonquin Round Table.

  • PaoliBulldog

    Mathis is “eyeing” a new deal in the same sense that I am eyeing Scarlett Johanssen: from a great distance, with zero chance of succeeding.

    • Will

      LMAO….

  • ClintonKillingsworth@live.com

    “Lunch pale”. Reporters are idiots.

    • Brian

      Chip Kelly Said that.

      • Andrew

        lol

        • Jerry Pomroy

          He did. It simply meant that Mathis is a no nonsense, get to work, leave your personal matters at home, blue collar guy.

          • Explorer51

            I think the comment was critical of the typo “pale” instead of “pail;” hardly deserving of idiot status aside from the fact that it was an editing, not a reporting, error.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            Apparently not up to killingsworth standards.

      • DharmaBum

        I think he’s referring to the misspelling of “pail”

        • Brian

          Thanks. Apparently, I’m a reporter.

      • ClintonKillingsworth@live.com

        Yep, and the reporter heard it, wrote it down or recorded it, then misspelled it in the article. Chain of command. ;]

    • Grammarian

      Not sure if you’re serious. Lunch “pail” is an object. Lunch “pale” would be a colorless lunch or unimportant lunch.

  • Eagles1018

    My thought is to always restructure so these guys get more guaranteed money.

  • Andy

    WTF???

  • Explorer51

    I’m starting to wait for Howie to pull off one of those Mission Impossible head masks and then we’ll see Joe Banner…

    • Will

      LMAO

  • Robert Perri

    What scares me here is his agent, Drew is notorious for this crap

    • Explorer51

      Clear the snow off the driveway Evan, it’s time for some sit-ups…

    • dnabrice

      He’s gotten tons of deals done with the Eagles over the years. TO was a long time ago.

      • Robert Perri

        Agreed he can definitely work with the Eagles, but he is also a master of manipulating the media. So Mathis wants an increase, Eagles hard-line him, so now there are stories in the news about Eagles wanting to trade him…

        • Jerry Pomroy

          Typical, but we hold the cards. Any team that wants to trade with us, has to pay our price before they even talk of paying his.

  • Brian

    The sky is falling!

  • Will

    I can’t really think who the Eagles could trade for draft picks on the current roster thats sad…sad state of Affairs…maybe a couple of ST Aces…lol….

  • Eagles1018

    Yes I’m going back to DJax:

    “I don’t deal with numbers. That’s not my job,” Kelly said, when asked if he felt Jackson was worth the salary, deferring to general manager Howie Roseman.

    Kelly added that Jackson has not approached the team about sweetening his contract. He said he got along well with Jackson in 2013, and that Jackson “did a good job” fitting into the team concept. “He played 16 games for us, practiced every day. I had no issues with him,” he said.

    Kelly was asked how the Eagles’ offense could possibly be better without Jackson on the team, and said, “I don’t think our offense has ever been predicated on one player. We used three quarterbacks last year. We used multiple running backs. Our tight ends are integral to what we do. I think we have an outstanding offensive line. It’s never been about just one guy.

    “It’s why I think we have diversity. I mean, we were first in rushing and I think ninth in passing. I think there is balance in terms of how we do things. You want great players at every position and I think that’s what we’re always striving for in terms of where we can put people into position. It’s never been predicated on just one guy, because if it is, if he’s out for a water break or hurt for an extended period of time, then you’re going to be in trouble.”

  • Will

    Wake me up if we trade or sign someone so much for the rumour mill….a much ado about nothing so far…

  • dnabrice

    The Eagles are starting to make the media look like a bunch of idiots with worthless sources. We’ll see how all this plays out.

  • EagleDuck

    Are the Eagles the new Patriots (in terms of personnel management)? And if so, is that a bad thing?

    • Token

      I guess you have to ask is Chip Bill Belichick and is Foles Tom Brady. No and no. So it doesnt really matter. And really, the Pats will bring in impact players in FA. I dont think the Eagles are following their mold.

      When you get down to it, through all this mess, I think Chip thinks hes the team. I believe he feels anyone can be plopped in there and he can coach them up. Kinda like in college. He can go get the C rated players and create a winning team with them.

      Unfortunately, this isnt the Pac-12. And the guy never even won anything in college.

      I was hoping he wouldnt carry over certain points of view from college, but its looking like he has.

      Id love to be in a room with Chip, Howie, Gamble, Davis and Shurmer when they are laying out their plan for the team. I cant imagine they agree on much. But its Chips franchise. Clearly these are all Chip moves.

      • EagleDuck

        Soooo, you’re saying you’re not a Chip fan?… Of course you can feel how ever you want, but ‘the guy never even won anything in college’? .868 win percentage, 4 Straight BCS bowls including the NC, won the Rose and Fiesta. I understand you’re not a fan but lets give credit where credit is due.

        • anon

          lots of division champs never a superbowl.

          • EagleDuck

            I don’t think we need to rehash the ol’ “you haven’t won anything unless you’ve won a Super Bowl / Championship” argument. It’s exhausting for both sides.

          • Token

            The only people who think otherwise are probably the people who were happy with participation trophies as kids.

          • EagleDuck

            You have a great job, you get paid well. But you’re not the CEO… Failure.

          • EagleDuck

            Alright, even I admit that was a sad analogy… never mind.

          • Token

            Thats not remotely the same thing.

          • EagleDuck

            yeah, I know… multi-tasking… didn’t give it enough effort.

          • RIP illa

            LMAO…up vote!!!

          • FMWarner

            There is a wide gap between not winning a Super Bowl and consistently losing. Did Bill Cowher suddenly go from a loser to a great coach when he finally won a Super Bowl after 13 years? This isn’t a question with a binary answer.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            I think he was referring to the Eagles prior to Chip, under Reid.

          • FMWarner

            Exhausting and pointless. However, also an easy way to find out who you can safely ignore.

        • Token

          Eh, lets just say I dont have blind faith in him. I think last year he came in and did a pretty good job for his first season. But had a bunch of lucky breaks last year. And a terrible schedule. Didnt do well against the good teams we played.

          Theres just a TON to prove yet before I start worshiping at his alter. Many already were before he coached a NFL game. Im guessing by your name that you may be one of those people.

          Now that we are starting to see how he shapes a roster, I have my doubts about it. Building from ST up isnt ideal.

          And lets be real, Chip beat up on the Pac12 in college than usually got beat up by the good teams like Stanford. Right? Doesnt mean the guy wont be successful, but lets at least be honest about it.

          I think Chip can probably maintain good offensive play. But he still doesnt care about D, that hasnt changed since college. Maybe with a elite DC you can get by with the type of players they have. But Davis isnt that guy IMO. Hes not a make chicken salad out of chicken shit type coach.

          At the same time, here I am blaming Davis for everything on D. It may not be all his fault. If you recall, he talked a lot about the 4-3 Under scheme before the season and in seasons past. He likes it and has ran it. I think he was overrulled here. I think Chip is making him run the 2 gap 3-4 system. I dont like that dynamic.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            I’d agree and call that fair. Although I think you’re jumping a bit too far before you’ve seen how the plan executes. Team’s don’t specifically win games in FA, or new coaches prove themselves after one season. Have to see how it all falls before saying it fell apart. That’s all I’m saying. I’m not that “in Chip we trust” guy, but I’m open too give opportunity to prove yourself.

          • Token

            Yea I agree with that. Maybe the plan unfolds and it turns out great. Maybe they are eyeing somebody in a trade. Who knows. I just know that looking at it right here and now, its not looking too great.

          • LookinAtMyGucci

            Stanford is in the Pac-12.

          • Token

            Yea wasnt saying they arent. They play a different brand of football.

          • knighn

            Chip Kelly, HC, vs Stanford
            Nov 7, 2009 (Oregon @ Stanford) L 42-51
            Oct 2, 2011 (Stanford @ Oregon) W 52-31
            Nov 12, 2011 (Oregon @ Stanford) W 53-30
            Nov 17, 2012 (Stanford @ Oregon) L 14-17 OT
            Is a 2-2 record, wins by 20+ points, losses by fewer than 10 points “always got beat up by good teams like Stanford”?

            Now, I will agree on some of your other points. Forget about 4-3U, I just thought the Eagles should have been playing more 4-3 last year, especially with Isaac Sopoaga on the roster.
            This 4-3 Front Seven:
            T. Cole – F. Cox – C. Thornton – B. Graham / V. Curry
            M. Kendricks – D. Ryans – C. Barwin

            Would have looked much better than this 3-4 Front Seven:
            F. Cox – I. Sopoaga – C. Thorton
            T. Cole – M. Kendricks – D. Ryans – C. Barwin

            I think you have some fair concerns… but your attempted point with Stanford was hyperbole.

      • Jerry Pomroy

        The Pats really only seem to bring in impact players on the cheap though. Guys that may be problem child labeled or on downside of career. Can’t think of anyone off the top of my head that was an impact player at the height of their game they’ve brought in through FA in recent years.

        • anon

          feel like we specifically aren’t taking those guys

          • Jerry Pomroy

            No and there isn’t anything wrong with that necessarily. The only guy that stands out to have been somewhat of a payoff would be Talib recently. Haynesworth was a failure, Chad Johnson failure, Moss a failure a few years back.

        • EagleDuck

          I was referring to the “we can win with anyone” methodology. ‘You want more than we’re willing to pay? Fine, consider yourself traded…’ That FO mentality that produces good results but isn’t necessarily popular with fans or players.

        • Token

          Revis wasnt cheap.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            Is he at the height of his career?? I don’t think so. I don’t see him falling off a cliff like a Nhamdi, but he’s not the same player from 2-3yrs ago.

            Plus, I think that move was to keep him on the same sideline as Brady rather than against him back with Jets & with father time is chasing Brady down.

  • anon

    Buy low sell high it’s not a crazy thought.

  • cliff henny

    Well above average employee asked for a raise, management said no…happens every day millions times over in corporate America. Mathis has about zero leverage. who’s lining up to pay 32yr old Guard significantly more than 5m or 15m over 3yrs? Sure Eagles point is he’s made a ton of money for a guy who was taken off scrapheap, and 3 more years at 5-6m is plenty fair. almost always side with players, but this one, on Howie’s side.

    • EagleDuck

      Agree 100%.

    • UncleCarm

      It seems like good money for a guard, even one of the best guards. Does anybody know how $5 mil compares around the league?

      • Warhound

        7th, I think.

        • Jerry Pomroy

          He’s 13th in APY according to overthecap.com at $5.1M/yr. He costs $6M against cap this year ($5M salary, $1M prorated bonus).

          Cliff posted the link to the top 50 Guards.

    • Token

      I can see why they wouldnt want to extend him. I get that. Hes 33 this year. It doesnt make a lot of sense. But then why keep Peters and pay him? They are getting rid of everyone else and look to be entering a full rebuild that could take 3 years. Everything thats happened since, just makes the Peters move look odd.

      • cliff henny

        Tackle vs Guard. guards are dug up and successful all the time. think Mathis is worth 5m, but he has zero leverage. Peters had a ton of leverage.

        • Adam G

          Peters deal can be ended after 2 years with almost no consequences.

          • cliff henny

            think every Howie contract, that’s a given

    • SoCalEaglesFan

      It’s fine except if it’s Desean Jackson.

      • cliff henny

        in the hierarchy of positions, finding guards is a lot easier than 1350/9 4.2 40 speed.

        • Jerry Pomroy

          4.2?? Sign that guy!!…lol.

          • cliff henny

            whatever jax runs…all I know, he’s even he’s leavin’..that’s fast enough for me

          • LookinAtMyGucci

            4.35. Fast, but ain’t 2002 Vick fast.

          • meteorologist

            Desean may run 4.35 in shorts, but he’s ELITE in field speed.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            Hell run 4.0 for a mega deal. jaccpot

    • meteorologist

      It’s a shock at first to hear this about Mathis. He’s one of the most respected Eagles. Makes you wonder if this kinda thing is typical only we are just now getting a glimpse at what goes on every offseason. However, Barbre did show flashes when he stepped in last year, and he’s very athletic. Reminds of how Mathis himself snuck up on us in 2011.

      http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/article-1/Barbre-And-Mathis-Share-Similar-Story/2724b8fb-c701-4158-8941-a0207485ae81
      http://articles.mcall.com/2013-11-13/sports/mc-eagles-barbre-1113-20131113_1_training-camp-jason-peters-demetress-bell
      http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/article-1/Deep-Dominant-O-Line-Shows-Growth/b5762915-c586-4c43-a914-3f09228dc73a

      • Jerry Pomroy

        Barbre isn’t a long term replacement though. He himself will be 30yo before season starts.

        • cliff henny

          rather see barbre replace Herremanns. or, at least get a shot.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            Based on play vs contract (per Eaglescap.com). Herremans is gonna cost $4.2M against cap this year, then $5.2M in ’15 & ’16. Mathis who has played at much higher level the past 2yrs, is looking at $6M this year, then $6.5M in ’15, $7M in ’16. Is being a Pro Bowl G worth that much more? Consider also that Mathis base jumps from $2M last year to $5M this year. That’s a hefty 150% raise for a G. I don’t see any leverage either on Mathis’ side.

          • cliff henny

            http://overthecap.com/top-player-salaries.php?Position=G
            .
            here’s another good link. add 1m to mathis salary and he jumps a lot. sure eagles are thinking he owes them a little hometown discount, guy was making 500k and picking splinters out of ass b4 coming to philly.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            I can see his deal being fair. I think his issue would probably be in getting more guaranteed. He’s only looking at $1.2apy guaranteed, clearing $5M signing bonus & $1M roster bonus. Not bad for a guy that didn’t come on strong until 29-30yo.

          • Adam G

            Seems like unless Todd plays better this year he is a goner.

        • meteorologist

          He’s low mileage like Mathis. Also Evan Mathis was 29 in 2011

          • Jerry Pomroy

            Yes but Mathis wasn’t necessarily expected to be a long term solution himself. I get your point. But with Mathis’ base salary jumping from $2M last year to $5M this year, I just see this as Rosenhaus looking to get some up front money with his client looking at turning 33 at season start to protect against injury and being able to actually collect on that hefty 150% increase in base salary. Trading him eats $3M, but saves $2M in base salary.

          • meteorologist

            Personally, I say pay the man. I understand guard is undervalued but Mathis has been dominant on the field and quiet off the field. If anyone deserves special treatment, it’s him.

            Just sayin we have a nice veteran in place to preclude a massive black hole should anything happen to our All Pro Guard.

          • Jerry Pomroy

            But he’s already getting paid. The fact that he’s here at $5M this year isn’t chump change. He sits at #13 as far as APY & already has $6M guaranteed in his pocket. If anything, I could see a restructure that gives him some more up front money but lower his base to equal in cap hit. But increasing his cap hit too much isn’t smart for a guy going to be 33.

          • meteorologist

            I wish he hadn’t said anything. He just signed the old deal not too long ago; granted he IS outperforming it to a large degree now.
            I can see both sides xD

  • Guest

    now this is a guy im welcome to move , any compensation for him would be welcome , eagles need to get younger on the line. Mathis sturggled to pass protect last season , him and lane were the weak spot of a good unit. If we could replace him with a guy like Zach Martin early or Morgan Moses in the 2nd who could eventually play RT that would be ideal.

    • LookinAtMyGucci

      Care to back up the claim that he struggles in pass protection?

    • George

      hes the best guard in the league…

    • jabostick

      I don’t know. It feels like a large part of Foles’ development was due to o-line consistency/continuity. I don’t want to mess with it if I dont have to.

      However, I think it is all much ado about nothing. It is an agent/GM pissing match that got over-covered because of where it happened (at an event with a lot of media, agents, front office personnel, etc)

    • Justin

      I think you’re confusing Mathis with Herremans.

  • Rahkem

    i wouldnt trade him but if he wants a new deal he has no leverage , i aint worried about it

  • Kev_H

    I think the Eagles are doing a smart thing and a helpful thing for Mathis if they are indeed exploring trade opportunities. I think they love him and are more than willing to pay him his salary, but I don’t think they are in a position to bump him up considerably. If somebody else will, and will part with enough, maybe he can get his pay day and the Eagles can upgrade over the long haul.

  • Scott J

    Not sure Mathis has any leverage. 33 years old and signed a 5 year contract two years ago. Looks like we’ll be drafting a receiver, safety, and now a guard.

  • GEAGLE

    LaConfora saying we want a 3rd for Mathis. But may settle on a 4th…..who the F is giving That up for a guard?

    • Adam G

      Absolutely nobody

      • GEAGLE

        Teams think if we can’t get a 3rd or a 4th for him that the eagles will keep him lol. Hope Mathis hasn’t sold his house yet

        • cliff henny

          all Mathis has to do is find a team who’ll meet his contract demands and give Eagles 3rd, so, seeya at LG Sept 9th in Eagles green Mathis

    • LookinAtMyGucci

      Mosher, that clown, is saying that because Herremans got a new deal in 2012 and Peters just got one, that now Mathis wants one. Sayin’ precedent is set. F’n idiot doesn’t realize Mathis got one in 2012, too. Dude is stupid.

      • Jerry Pomroy

        A bigger one than Herremans at that. Who was paid as a tackle I might add.

      • DharmaBum

        Mosher is the worst. Between him and Derrick Gunn, they drove this whole DeSean thing to a fever pitch. Hacks.

    • cliff henny

      that they have to pay significantly more than 5m. when FA market just set at about 4m for top guards. probably get Foles if sent all of ’14 and 1/2 of ’15 draft. sounds like Eagles are shark fishing with minnows.

    • FMWarner

      That is a price higher than anyone will pay and a price lower than the Eagles should accept. So it makes no sense until you see that LaCanfora wrote it.

  • daggolden

    Chip Kelly already publicly said while at Oregon that he would never pay a QB 100 million dollars that his system would allow the next QB to step in. People are fools if they think Foles is getting a mega deal. You cant name me a QB who has won a SB that has a mega deal. The Brees, Rogers, Bradies of the world received big money after thre SB. The cheap QBs are winning, Wilson, Flacco etc.

    • Jerry Pomroy

      And Flacco got paid after his SB. I think Falcons jumped gun on paying Ryan. Foles deal will most likely be predicated on Newton deal & his own individual performance this year of course.

    • http://abigbuttandasmile.com/ A Big Butt and a Smile

      And like I said above, if Foles produces and the other QBs get their 18mil+ a year he should tell Kelly and the Eagles to kiss his @ss…’cause if they don’t pay someone else will.

  • DharmaBum

    I don’t think this is anything to get too riled up about. I don’t think it will happen, and even if it does, it won’t happen in a way that’s unfavorable to the Eagles. He’s under contract for 3 more years, at a good number, so if someone wanted to trade for him, they’d be doing it for the nice contract…but Mathis would be equally unhappy. If they were trading for him, and were willing to give him more money, then they’d necessarily value him enough to give us a good price. Add in the fact that, as Chip said, he’s a lunch-pail type of guy, who buys in all the way, and I don’t see any way this can end badly for the Birds, no matter which way it goes.

  • Javi Echie

    In no way would I like to see Mathis traded but if we do trade him I think the eagles need to get on the phone with the dolphins (who barely have enough players to start on there o-line) and see if we can work out a trade where they get mathis and we get Jordan. Also this scenario is based totally on the confidence the birds have in barbre. Just food for thought.

    • Adam G

      Jordan trade is so unlikely. Would cause a 10 mil cap hit to dolphins. They literally can’t do it unless they unload Wallace, which I don’t even think anybody would give them a 7th rounder for. His base salary this year is 15 mil.

      • Javi Echie

        Oh yea I always forget about the cap hit they would take on Jordan. All these reports that they are trying to trade Wallace is crazzzyy like who in there right mind would trade for him with that ludicrous contract they gave him lol

  • oreofestar

    My whole thought on this is simple the Eagles want more picks and hey want them bad and obviously sme guys like Cox, Foles, Mccoy, Coop, Kendricks, Kelce etc. aint going anywhere but some guys who may be seen as somewhat expendable like a DJAX or Mathis are being guaged for value since guys like Graham probably do not have much of a market

  • Spinelli

    Any player can be had for the right price.
    Draft Needs in order as I see
    Pass Rusher
    Safety
    Nose Tackle

    Linebacker
    Guard
    WR