Eagles Wake-Up Call: Kelly Explains Why He Brought Vick Back

(Last month, a group of reporters had the opportunity to sit down with head coach Chip Kelly for an hour-long session. The contents of that conversation have been embargoed until now. We’ll pull from that interview over the next several days as we begin our training camp previews.)

We have received this question more than perhaps any other since Chip Kelly decided to bring  Michael Vick back on a one-year deal: If this is a long-term project, why invest a year in a veteran quarterback who might not be part of future plans?

Chances are Vick won’t be here much longer. Meanwhile, there are two young quarterbacks on the roster that will be relegated to the sidelines if Vick wins the job. How can you evaluate what you have in Nick Foles and/or Matt Barkley if they don’t play?

Kelly’s response to this question speaks to both his mentality and the challenge he faces during his transition from college to the pros.

“You want to talk about our players buying in? If I went in the locker room and said this is going to be a really good year for us to get ready for the following year, that’s not going to work,” he said. “No one has a mindset like that. So our decision isn’t based upon what is the future two years down the road, three years down the road. I don’t think that far.”

Really, he can’t afford to. True, he signed a lucrative five-year deal and owner Jeffrey Lurie will give him some leeway as he builds the program in his vision. It’s not about capturing the confidence of his employer — he already has that. It’s about establishing credibility with the 53 men he is in charge of leading on a daily basis.

This is not just a run-of-the-mill college coach trying to make the leap. Kelly is branded as an out-of-the-box thinker with new methods that have yet to be tested on this level. Guys are wearing sleep monitors to bed, practicing at warp speed and essentially being asked to re-think the way they have done things up until this point. Maybe the Eagles don’t need to advance to the NFC Championship Game in Year One, but there needs to be some tangible proof that Kelly’s unorthodox approach will net results.

Vick is likely seen as the best quarterback on the roster by most of his peers. Certainly the most established.  How would it be if Kelly’s first move was to dismiss the team’s best QB? What if the Foles or Barkley experience fell flat on its face? Where would the confidence level in the new coach be then?

“My job is to win right now. How do you think I’d be received in Philly if I told them we were going to write this year off?” Kelly asked. “Those people that are waving to me on the streets right now? That ain’t going to happen. But that’s never been my mentality either. We’re not writing anything off. We’re going out there to compete and see how it falls.”

Kelly is a firm believer in position battles. He makes the players earn their starting jobs in practice and during the preseason. From his vantage point, it makes perfect sense to have Vick as part of the quarterback competition. Win or lose, the players will know that Kelly made the right call. In theory, at least.

“Everywhere I’ve been it’s played itself out on the field. Does that mean it’s going to happen here? I don’t know,” said Kelly. “But I’ve never been in a situation where we’ve had to make a decision and it’s like 50-50, pick it out of a hat. Somebody over the course of time has stepped up and has ‘won the battle.’ That’s what you’re hoping to have happen again here, and hopefully it’s evident to everybody, like ‘There’s no question that it’s this guy because his game stepped up.’”

WHAT YOU MISSED

Who has Pro Bowl promise under Kelly? That and more in the latest Twitter Mailbag.

Applying “Smart Football” Concepts to the Eagles.

Can the Eagles bounce back and make the playoffs in 2013?

WHAT THEY’RE SAYING

Andrew Kulp on what to expect from rookie tight end Zach Ertz. 

Don’t go overboard. If all goes according to plan, Ertz could eventually develop into one of the most dangerous weapons on the team, but there is reason to believe he could be brought along slowly as a rookie.

For one, as was already touched on, Ertz isn’t supposed to be much of a blocker. That’s no small detail, as blocking is typically a fairly large part of the job description for most tight ends. Guys can get away with being more receiver-inclined when they’re putting up big numbers, but Ertz is starting from the bottom, so he’ll likely have to improve that aspect of his game to earn the trust of the coaching staff.

Donovan McNabb thinks Foles might be best suited to run Kelly’s system. He had the following to say on NFL Network:

 “When you’re a quarterback it’s important that you protect the football. And when you have a guy like Michael Vick, we know about his athletic ability but he has an ability to turn the ball over entirely too much. Nick Foles is kind of a future guy that you can work on. In the offense that Oregon ran, it might be better suited for a guy like Nick Foles because you don’t have to be so mobile, just get the ball out of your hands and make plays for the receivers.

COMING UP

More from our conversation with Kelly. Ten days until rookies report.

Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive. By posting here, you are permitting Philadelphia magazine and Metro Corp. to edit and republish your comment in all media.

  • nicksaenz1

    I’ll say this, from day 1, Kelly has come in and shown that he can handle the media. How he does with the media should we start out in dismal fashion is another thing, but, so far, he’s handled the media exquisitely. Based on what he said in the article, he gave all of the right answers, using the simple premise that he has to get the team to buy in.
    $3.5mil to help the team buy what he’s selling? Cost of doing business. Smart man. I didn’t like bringing back Vick at all, but for this reason alone, I’ll eat my words. Means if/when Foles does earn the job, the team will get behind that. I dig it.

    • Jack Waggoner

      And there’s a potential payoff, though increasingly a longshot, that Vick could put it all together and be the QB people have hoped for years he could be.

      • nicksaenz1

        You’re absolutely right. I don’t see it, but entirely plausible. Either way, for the sake of building the team, that’s $3.5mil well spent.

  • Jack Waggoner

    It’s interesting that McNabb’s opinions are getting so much media attention lately. He’s trying to angle his way into a media career, I think.

    The explanation as to why Kelly kept Vick is a little difficult to process, but I guess he had a couple of bad options either of which would make him lose credibility among the players he’s trying to get to buy in to his way of doing things. Kelly could have left it in Roseman’s hands, but that would have made Kelly seem powerless if Roseman dumped Vick.

    • nicksaenz1

      JW, McNabb does have somewhat of a media career, that’s why he has the platform to be quoted.

    • southy

      He is fast becoming (imo rather unfortunately) NFL Network’s “QB Analyst” like Dilfer is on ESPN. He’s expected to take a stance one way or the other, or call guys out like RGIII.

  • DeSean Grayson

    I think you bring Vick back because he still strikes FEAR into NFL defenses with his arm and his legs. Chip is doing it right, make Vick earn the job and still see what you have in Foles. BUT THE THING THAT STRIKES ME AS ODD IS WHY DENNIS DIXON DOES NOT GET ANY CONSIDERATION IN THIS QB BATTLE? Wasnt he the QB that made you relevant @ Oregon. He still has plenty in the tank due to the fact that he never played in Pittsburgh and was a practice squad QB in Baltimore. Is he really that horrible, i dont think so.

  • nicksaenz1

    Can’t wait for season 2 to start up tonight!

  • MAC

    Actually look at the stats. Vick average pass per completion 6.73 yards. Foles 6.41. Not to much difference in the results. So it’s not like Foles who you call Mr Check down was averaging a few yards less a completion. They were practically same results per pass. So the #’s don’t really play out the way your saying.

  • MAC

    Vick average pass play last year 6.73 yards per completion. Foles was 6.43 yards per. Not really a big difference huh? So that ends that part of the Vick vs Foles accuracy debate. Both QB’s results per completion were almost the exact same.

  • G_WallyHunter

    yup