Al Gore Is a Greenhouse Gasbag

Posted on 2/2/07   Page 3 of 7
Text Size: A | A | A
 
Our world is habitable because some of the heat from the sun is held here by gases in the atmosphere that are descriptively labeled "greenhouse gases." Carbon dioxide is one of the main components. Unfortunately, measurements over the past 30 years show a steep climb in carbon dioxide concentrations and happen to track closely a concurrent rise in the average temperature of the Earth. All that extra carbon dioxide, a.k.a. CO2, isn't produced "naturally"; it's mostly a result of mankind burning fossil fuels.

If the profligate use of fossil fuels continues and the carbon dioxide levels keep rising, the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere and oceans will rise to calamitous heights, melting glaciers, disturbing water systems, and causing droughts, crop failures, and much stronger hurricanes and cyclones. Gore forecasts the worst-case scenario as "a nature walk through the Book of Revelation."

But the real worst case that the once (and future?) politician presents is the breakup and melting of the two massive ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica, an event that would raise global sea levels so much that many coastal areas would be under water. Using an animated seeping blue stain that's reminiscent of how filmmakers once illustrated the progress of the Nazi regime, Gore shows large parts of San Francisco, Beijing, Shanghai and New York becoming submerged. The result, he says, will be tens of millions of "climate refugees." It will make the upheaval caused by the flooding of New Orleans and its displaced persons seem like a walk in the park.

There's no way to watch An Inconvenient Truth without getting worried — at least a little worried.

Not Bob Giegengack. He has described Al Gore's documentary as "a political statement timed to present him as a presidential candidate in 2008." And he added, "The glossy production is replete with inaccuracies and misrepresentations, and appeals to public fear as shamelessly as any other political statement that hopes to unite the public behind a particular ideology." This from a guy who voted for Gore in 2000 and says he'd probably vote for him again.

Geologists by nature and training take a long-term view. The professor clicks a slide onto the classroom screen. It reads: "In 1958, Robert Giegengack first heard about Global Warming!"

There are a few chuckles in the classroom. Giegengack waits a beat for comic effect. "I said, 'Big deal,'" he tells the class. "I lived in New England."

He'd been born in Brooklyn, but spent much of his life in New Haven. After a false start studying civil engineering at Yale, Giegengack discovered geology and got hooked. He got a master's degree in Colorado, then returned to Yale for a doctorate and focused his research on rocks and climate change. He arrived as a young assistant professor at Penn just about the time the first Earth Day in 1970 was reflecting — and driving — an interest in the environment. Giegengack got the assignment to set up the university's environmental studies program, which he would run for more than three decades.

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next

 

User Comments:

One comment, one correction
Posted by Doug | Oct. 24, 2007 at 5:16 PM
COMMENT:
Correction- Michael Crichton's book is skeptical of global warming, not for it. I met a man two years ago who has taught climatology at University of Virgina and now North Carolina. He is not connected with big oil or big anything. He says that there is absolutely no evidence of man's contribution to global warming. He says just follow the money to those making millions off this hoax. Good reporting. I would like to see an article detailing the incorrectness of each of Gore's points in The Inconvenient Truth for argumentative purposes with my left leaning sister and aunt.
Nonsense
Posted by Steve | Oct. 29, 2007 at 9:50 AM
COMMENT:
No scientist is making millions from Global Warming - follow the real money to the coal and oil companies. They ought to be paying a carbon tax for their pollution instead of funding skeptics. I'm no fan of Gore but the science in his film is accurate according to dozens of climate experts I've talked to.
"accurate science" endorsed by "dozens of climate experts"
Posted by Daniel | Nov. 2, 2007 at 10:17 AM
COMMENT:
I would like to see the names of twenty-four (two dozen) people who say they are climate experts and who also say that the "science" in An Inconvenient Truth is "accurate" without qualification. The "science" in that film consists ENTIRELY of two uncontested facts: (1) CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and (2) CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and global temperatures have fluctuated essentially in lockstep for at least the last 500,000 years. Ergo the changing CO2 concentrations cause the global temperature fluctuations. It is a simple application of the well-known logical truth, "post hoc, ergo propter hoc."
Global Warming
Posted by Walter | Nov. 8, 2007 at 11:54 PM
COMMENT:
Al Gore's film "An Inconvienient Truth" shows an enormous graph which statistically clearly shows temperature increasing first and then this is followed later by an increase in the concentration of C02 in the atmosphere. This proves that Al Gore is a fool and that an increase in C02 does not lead to any significant global warming. C02 at only 380 parts per million is much to small to cause any significant global warming.
air and climate
Posted by garrett | Jan. 8, 2008 at 1:36 PM
COMMENT:
i am doing a project on air and climate polution and i need to interveiw someone i was wondering if i could get anyone to give me their input on global warming air pollution and green house gases if anyone could get back to me at ggsteiger@aol.com
have any of you read the IPCC reports?
Posted by Alex | Feb. 4, 2008 at 10:55 AM
COMMENT:
first of all, "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" is a logical *fallacy* not a logical truth. second of all, al gore is someone who is just bringing about awareness. he's not a scientist nor claims to be leading the research in climate change, so arguing against him is like shooting the messenger. if you're going to follow the lazy, money motivated psuedo-science of big oil cronies at least address the real challenges to it.
Okay
Posted by Fered | Feb. 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM
COMMENT:
yeah, burn!
kqiapcndms
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 22, 2008 at 12:31 PM
COMMENT:
xinare | [url= click here ]wikexi[/url] | [link= click here ]nitepu[/link] | click here | penewu | [ click here huneci]
ushi
Posted by ushi | Mar. 11, 2009 at 5:31 PM
COMMENT:
Scientists aree supporting the government in propaganda about CO2. Whay is this being done, What for? Civil liberties were erroded by FEAR of terrorists, will the control freaks of the left be using this climate change to make people afraid adn give up thier freedoms. Never has it been known for centuries that a government has wielded dso much power over the populace as today in this uncivilised Western world. How can anyone respect scientists when they will not be truthful that ABORTION kills living humans. How can we believe governments and scientists when they plough public moneys into research on human embryos which has proved barren of positive help for humans saying stem cell research is necessary to find cures when they also neglect to fund the proven and fruitful areas of other stem cell research which are using adult stem cells and embryonis cord blood cells. Scientists and governments are corrupters of truth.
If CO2 is the problem, than it's Game OVER.....
Posted by Max | Apr. 29, 2009 at 5:29 PM
COMMENT:
I agree with Professor Giegengack, if you truly believe CO2 is the problem and that cutting Fossil Fuels emissions (Coal Power Plants!) by half in the U.S. before 2029-2050, how does that address what China AND India combined will increasingly add in the next 10 years? 60 Minutes' Scott Pelley ran a piece on the subject of Coal, and he interviewed the CEO of Duke Energy, reporting that "Clean Coal" has a solution but its cost prohibitive and Duke Energy has a "transition plan" to take place over the next 50 years to clean up coal. Then you have Global Warming experts claiming that 50 years is too late! CO2 is simply NOT enough of a challenge for our planet not to be able to handle through its own planetary natural scrubbing already in place and proven by thousands of years of science data!
Philadelphia It List

Chase Sapphire (SM) Spotlight

The most exciting events & happenings around Philadelphia. View them here.
 
 

Philly Cooks

Congratulations to the 2010 Philly Cooks! Winners. Click here to see who won Dish of the Year, the winning dishes, event photos and more...
 
 

Martini Madness

Stir, Sip & Socialize at the year's most anticipated cocktail party. Don't miss the madness! March 31. National Constitution Center.
 
 

Green House

Visit our virtual room-by-room green guide for energy-saving tips and ideas.