Feature Article

Al Gore Is a Greenhouse Gasbag

By John Marchese

Page 2 of 7

Gieg is situated at a lectern in the pit of an amphitheater classroom. As the seats fill, he fiddles with his Mac laptop, where he has stored a PowerPoint presentation that covers today's lecture. Before that, though, he runs a short clip from a Simpsons episode in which Bart and Lisa argue over whether water drains in different directions in the Southern and Northern hemispheres. Though Gieg has long been known as an entertaining lecturer, he's not The Simpsons. The students laugh out loud at the clip, as does their professor. When the lights come back on, the professor assures them: "Bart will probably not be on the final."

The class is a typical-seeming group, heavy on girls, some of whom wear ripped jeans and do-rags, others of whom are carefully made up and snappily dressed, pulling their notebooks from designer bags. Midway through the class, Gieg says, "Now it's time for us to talk about the number one political/environmental issue of our time." He reads a snippet from a New York Times editorial about the Supreme Court global-warming case.

"What I'm going to try to do the rest of today and also probably on Tuesday is bring you up to date on this. I'll try to avoid editorializing or politicking. I'll just tell you some stuff. Give you information. There's lot's of stuff, and it's very complicated."

Gieg gazes upward toward his young charges. "Every single one of you knows more about this than Al Gore," he tells the undergrads. "And vastly more than anyone in this present administration."


YOU REMEMBER AL GORE. Congressman, then senator from a political dynasty in Tennessee. Vice president for the eight years of the Clinton administration. President-elect of the United States for about 10 minutes, before being waylaid by the dangling chad. Since his bitter, disputed loss to George W. Bush, Gore has gone through some changes. He tried sporting a beard, reinvented himself as a media entrepreneur, hosted Saturday Night Live, gained a lot of weight. Then, last May, he burst back into the public eye as the star of a surprisingly successful documentary on global warming called An Inconvenient Truth. In a way that sometimes happens in America, Al Gore has come to personify an issue that until recently, most of us didn't know we needed to know or care about. Oprah calls him "our Noah." But if she's going to get all ancient on us, Cassandra might be the better comparison.

Gore's film has become the third highest grossing documentary ever, way behind Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 but closing in on number two, the equally surprising March of the Penguins. An Inconvenient Truth is basically the video of a PowerPoint presentation that Gore had been giving for years, jazzed up with animation and film clips, but weighted by some treacly autobiographical segments that seem to have been left over from an Al Gore for President campaign film.

The new Al Gore, visibly more relaxed and likable than during his last campaign, basically says this:

 

Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next


Change text size
Print

Email

Write a comment
 
 

User comments

One comment, one correction
Posted by Doug | Oct. 24, 2007 at 5:16 PM
COMMENT:
Correction- Michael Crichton's book is skeptical of global warming, not for it. I met a man two years ago who has taught climatology at University of Virgina and now North Carolina. He is not connected with big oil or big anything. He says that there is absolutely no evidence of man's contribution to global warming. He says just follow the money to those making millions off this hoax. Good reporting. I would like to see an article detailing the incorrectness of each of Gore's points in The Inconvenient Truth for argumentative purposes with my left leaning sister and aunt.
Nonsense
Posted by Steve | Oct. 29, 2007 at 9:50 AM
COMMENT:
No scientist is making millions from Global Warming - follow the real money to the coal and oil companies. They ought to be paying a carbon tax for their pollution instead of funding skeptics. I'm no fan of Gore but the science in his film is accurate according to dozens of climate experts I've talked to.
"accurate science" endorsed by "dozens of climate experts"
Posted by Daniel | Nov. 2, 2007 at 10:17 AM
COMMENT:
I would like to see the names of twenty-four (two dozen) people who say they are climate experts and who also say that the "science" in An Inconvenient Truth is "accurate" without qualification. The "science" in that film consists ENTIRELY of two uncontested facts: (1) CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and (2) CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and global temperatures have fluctuated essentially in lockstep for at least the last 500,000 years. Ergo the changing CO2 concentrations cause the global temperature fluctuations. It is a simple application of the well-known logical truth, "post hoc, ergo propter hoc."
Global Warming
Posted by Walter | Nov. 8, 2007 at 11:54 PM
COMMENT:
Al Gore's film "An Inconvienient Truth" shows an enormous graph which statistically clearly shows temperature increasing first and then this is followed later by an increase in the concentration of C02 in the atmosphere. This proves that Al Gore is a fool and that an increase in C02 does not lead to any significant global warming. C02 at only 380 parts per million is much to small to cause any significant global warming.
air and climate
Posted by garrett | Jan. 8, 2008 at 1:36 PM
COMMENT:
i am doing a project on air and climate polution and i need to interveiw someone i was wondering if i could get anyone to give me their input on global warming air pollution and green house gases if anyone could get back to me at ggsteiger@aol.com
have any of you read the IPCC reports?
Posted by Alex | Feb. 4, 2008 at 10:55 AM
COMMENT:
first of all, "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" is a logical *fallacy* not a logical truth. second of all, al gore is someone who is just bringing about awareness. he's not a scientist nor claims to be leading the research in climate change, so arguing against him is like shooting the messenger. if you're going to follow the lazy, money motivated psuedo-science of big oil cronies at least address the real challenges to it.
Okay
Posted by Fered | Feb. 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM
COMMENT:
yeah, burn!
kqiapcndms
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 22, 2008 at 12:31 PM
COMMENT:
xinare | [url= click here ]wikexi[/url] | [link= click here ]nitepu[/link] | click here | penewu | [ click here huneci]
ushi
Posted by ushi | Mar. 11, 2009 at 5:31 PM
COMMENT:
Scientists aree supporting the government in propaganda about CO2. Whay is this being done, What for? Civil liberties were erroded by FEAR of terrorists, will the control freaks of the left be using this climate change to make people afraid adn give up thier freedoms. Never has it been known for centuries that a government has wielded dso much power over the populace as today in this uncivilised Western world. How can anyone respect scientists when they will not be truthful that ABORTION kills living humans. How can we believe governments and scientists when they plough public moneys into research on human embryos which has proved barren of positive help for humans saying stem cell research is necessary to find cures when they also neglect to fund the proven and fruitful areas of other stem cell research which are using adult stem cells and embryonis cord blood cells. Scientists and governments are corrupters of truth.
If CO2 is the problem, than it's Game OVER.....
Posted by Max | Apr. 29, 2009 at 5:29 PM
COMMENT:
I agree with Professor Giegengack, if you truly believe CO2 is the problem and that cutting Fossil Fuels emissions (Coal Power Plants!) by half in the U.S. before 2029-2050, how does that address what China AND India combined will increasingly add in the next 10 years? 60 Minutes' Scott Pelley ran a piece on the subject of Coal, and he interviewed the CEO of Duke Energy, reporting that "Clean Coal" has a solution but its cost prohibitive and Duke Energy has a "transition plan" to take place over the next 50 years to clean up coal. Then you have Global Warming experts claiming that 50 years is too late! CO2 is simply NOT enough of a challenge for our planet not to be able to handle through its own planetary natural scrubbing already in place and proven by thousands of years of science data!

Post a comment

(* = required field.)
  • Please check to make sure that your referer is not blocked.


Subject line of your comment*
Your comments (200 words max)*
Email*
First name*
Last Name*
Enter the code shown below.
Visual CAPTCHA
This helps prevent automated form submissions.
Philadelphia It List

Lets Do Cocktails: Recipes

Take a sneak peak into the latest, mouth-watering cocktails that will be featured in Philadelphia's area restaurants this season.
 
 

Whiskey Festival 2009

Join us at the 2009 Whiskey Festival - a tasting event featuring premium whiskeys and spirits from around the world. November 12. 6:30pm. Union League of Philadelphia. $85. Buy Tickets Now.
 
 

Design Home 2009

Philadelphia magazine's Eighth Annual Design Home. Follow our progress and explore the details as they come to life in two magnificent carriage homes at Haverford Reserve. Tours start September 10th.
 
 

6th Annual Trailblazer Award

Do you know an accomplished business woman? Submit your nomination today for Philadelphia magazine's 6th Annual Trailblazer Award! Deadline is November 6.
 
 

FYI Philly

Watch FYI Philly on 6 ABC! Join hosts Karen Rogers and Adam Joseph for all things sizzling and buzzworthy. Each show includes content from the editors of Philly Mag.