Schools 2009: Ranking Methodology

Posted on September 2009  
Text Size: A | A | A
 
Philadelphia magazine researchers first looked at SAT data for public high schools in our eight-county area (Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; Burlington, Camden and Gloucester in New Jersey). Schools whose average total SAT score fell outside of the top 75 were removed from consideration.

For the remaining schools, we collected data in the following additional areas: enrollment; percentage of graduates going to a two- or four-year college; percentage of 11th-grade students ranked proficient or above in state assessment tests (in Pennsylvania, the PSSA; in New Jersey, the HSPA); number of subjects in which students took AP exams; number of varsity sports; number of clubs and activities; student-faculty ratio; overall expenditure per student; percentage of expenditures dedicated to instruction; teacher education level; and percentage of students eligible for free lunch.

Information came from school websites and school district officials; the Pennsylvania department of education website; the New Jersey department of education website; and greatschools.com.

We then sent our data to George Recck, a statistical expert at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts. He calculated a standardized value for each school for each category. (An inverse standardized value was used for the following categories: students-to-AP subjects; students-to-varsity sports; students-to-clubs & activities, and student/teacher ratio. This is due to the fact that a lower value would be considered better than a higher value.) If a school had no data for a particular category, the mean of the category was substituted. Then, predetermined weights were applied to each category to compute an overall standardized Z-score for each school. The following weights were used for each category:

Category/Weight
SAT-Verbal: 5%
SAT-Math: 5%
SAT-Writing: 5%
State Assessment Test Average: 15%
Students to AP Tests: 10%
% Going to College: 15%
Student-to-Varsity Sports: 5%
Student-to-Clubs/Activities: 5%
Student/Teacher Ratio: 10%
Teacher Post-Secondary Education: 5%
Overall Expenditure Per Student: 10%
Instructional Expenditure Percentage: 5%
Free Lunch Percentage: 5%
TOTAL: 100%
Originally published in Philadelphia magazine, September 2009
 

User Comments:

Best High School Rankings 2009
Posted by Bev | Aug. 28, 2009 at 9:24 AM
COMMENT:
I would be curious to know where Spring-Ford (Montco) came in. I was surprised not to see us on your list.
High Spending A Good Thing?
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 28, 2009 at 12:55 PM
COMMENT:
Interesting that you choose to reward schools for spending more money than others, regardless of results. I notice that Haddonfield (#1) spends $5,000 per year less than the number 1 and number 3 schools. That should be a plus, not a minus, given the excellent results achieved.
Mistake or flawed methodology
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM
COMMENT:
The omission of Moorestown (NJ) HS is either an error in data analysis or a flawed methodology. Consistently ranked as one of the top 3 public high schools in southern NJ for years, and sending many of its graduates to top universities, I wonder why it was not included in the list?
More than a Mystery
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 28, 2009 at 4:37 PM
COMMENT:
Is this omission a conspiracy? Was that lack of Haddonfield spending due to a majority of money being paid to Philadelphia Magazine? With Moorestown not on this list, the facts seem to be adding up. I demand an investigation on this topic. -Moorestown Senior
Likely Error in Moorestown Absence
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 28, 2009 at 5:20 PM
COMMENT:
It is not a mystery, more likely a data error, unreconciled by an out of area survey preparer who wouldn't know Haddonfield from Haddon Heights or Moorestown from Moorestown Friends. Embarrassing that your mag would right an article on schools and get a failing grade on the big test. Moorestown succeeds routinely with a diverse income and racial mix, great school spirit and a high acheiving student body. Good test takers also show their work but you conveniently failed to include the inputs to the calcs for all to check veracity.
"Likely Error" in Moorestown
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM
COMMENT:
Don't take it so personally. Moorestown is indeed a great school. But your posting shows that spell-check can't save all efforts in WRITING. Next year I'm sure you'll be back on the list. Hey, notice a Jersey school can't possibly be #1 -- even tho' they manage to get really good scores spending way less! Something clearly lacking in methodology there.
I have the same question...
Posted by Mika | Aug. 29, 2009 at 2:00 PM
COMMENT:
Masterman has the highest % to college, the highest SAT, second high PA and lowest spending per student!(in top 10) and you consider this ...8th in ranking? Weird method of ranking, indeed!
incomprehensible
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 29, 2009 at 3:32 PM
COMMENT:
The exclusion of Moorestown from this list makes the entire ranking questionable. As a longterm resident of Moorestown and parent of high school alumni, I am acutely aware of the high school's excellence. Considering the average SAT scores (equivalent to Haddonfield and Cherry Hill East)and the hundreds of graduates accepted yearly at top-tier colleges and universities, Moorestown's absence from the list was at worst, a silly oversight, or worst, the product of substandard reporting. Moorestown will continue to be a destination for young families interested in the best in public education. Did I spell all of that correctly?
Error in Reporting Haddonfield SAT scores
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 31, 2009 at 5:53 AM
COMMENT:
Haddonfield's SAT scores are incorrectly reported - the numbers were switched for reading and math. According to the Haddonfield's BOE report in November 2008 the scores were as follows: V: (Critical Reading) 573; M: 580; W: 575. And not V: 580 and M: 573 as the article incorrectly posted. This data was presented by the BOE and can be viewed at: www.haddonfield.k12.nj.us/eblast/SAT..AP_Report_to_Board_November_20_2008.pdf Would this change their ranking to #4?
Cry Baby Cry Moorestown
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 31, 2009 at 8:37 AM
COMMENT:
So typical of Moorestown residents, blame everyone else when things don't go their way. I'm sure that Moorestown would be right near #1 if the list was for top snobbish, elitist attitude schools. And no, before anyone posts something, we are not jealous.
Percent going to college and Proficency Average
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 31, 2009 at 3:14 PM
COMMENT:
Did those two things mean nothing? Central High has 98% of students going to college, and a 99 PA, higher than any other school on the list. Not to mention Northeast High winning for Diversity. Did you even look at Central's students, or notice that their Indian Pakistani club is much larger than Northeast's?
Yeah, Cinnaminson!
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 1, 2009 at 4:38 PM
COMMENT:
Finally, Cinnaminson gets some recognition. Excellent academics, terrific sports, outstanding music and marching band. Surprised Moorestown is missing, but the best kept secret in South Jersey is now out of the bag.
Re: Haddonfield's SAT scores
Posted by TimHaas | Sep. 2, 2009 at 7:59 AM
COMMENT:
Though we broke out the component scores for the printed chart, for ranking purposes we used only the combined score. Accordingly, the mistake did not affect Haddonfield's position in the ranking. -- Tim Haas, Online Editor
Philly Mag Royally Screw Up & Moorestown Schools Receive an Apology
Posted by Kevin | Sep. 2, 2009 at 7:50 PM
COMMENT:
The executive editor of Philadelphia Magazine issued a letter of apology to the Moorestown school superintendant for omitting Moorestown. It can be viewed here: click here
Poor ranking criteria
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 5, 2009 at 11:59 AM
COMMENT:
I have to agree with others that spending per student is questionable as a ranking criteria. I might consider it somewhat useful, but certainly not 10%. More importantly, the free lunch % being given a weighting of 5% (as much as any single SAT portion) is just plain silly. It's great that they provide such a thing, but for most parents it's a meaningless statistic.
Moorestown
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM
COMMENT:
Letter of apology??? Come on... Add to that the rank that Moorestown SHOULD have been given. Make it right!
stat6
Posted by Sixth | Sep. 10, 2009 at 10:41 AM
COMMENT:
OMG Like why is free lunch even a criteria? Does this mean that poor kids = bad skool?
Rich = Quality Edumacation?
Posted by Rob | Sep. 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM
COMMENT:
I hold this to be a silly situation, it seems that what is used as a 5% criteria is whether kids have free lunch or not. Does tis mean that the poor are worse schools or better schools? Can you please explain?
Ranking of high schools
Posted by Joan | Sep. 16, 2009 at 11:35 AM
COMMENT:
It is absolutely ourageous that you have not included Moorestown in your list. What kind of research office do you have? Obviously the rest of the list is open to questions.
Biased as Usual
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 24, 2009 at 6:57 AM
COMMENT:
It comes as no surprise that THE Mainline magazine skews to the left for its friends, Harriton and Lower Merion. Hardly a fan of Phila. schools, Masterman, St. Joe's and Central consistantly blow away the others.
Phila Mag Forgot To Include Haverford High School's High Scores
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 5, 2009 at 11:40 PM
COMMENT:
Last year, Haverford High School was 13th on the list , but Philadelphia Magazine failed to even include Haverford Township's scores when crunching the data. Haverford High School's test scores, SAT scores, teacher/student ratio and other criteria show that Haverford Township public schools belong high on the list. While Philadelphia Magazine plans to run a correction in the October issue, this is not enough. This kind of flawed journalism should be corrected by retracting the original article and replacing it with a CORRECTED report on this website. Re-running the data to include ALL the schools missed in the first round and re-publishing the corrected report is the only responsible thing to do. Otherwise, Philadelphia Magazine truly discredits itself.
The Corrected Chart IS Online
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM
COMMENT:
click here
School rankings
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 11, 2009 at 12:11 PM
COMMENT:
All of the statistical should be available on line
how many schools in the mix
Posted by dee | Nov. 24, 2009 at 12:58 PM
COMMENT:
53 out of how many schools were evaluated
free lunch more important
Posted by Anonymous | May. 30, 2010 at 11:19 AM
COMMENT:
My research shows that approximately half of the variation in a school's achievement scores is directly related to the school population's income level. Free lunch percentage should be given 50% weight in your calculation, not 5%.
Weighting system
Posted by Elaine | Nov. 29, 2010 at 9:06 AM
COMMENT:
How are the weights of each indicator determined?
 
Philadelphia It List

Philadelphia magazine's Philly Cooks

Join Philadelphia magazine for a unique tasting experience as the city’s top chefs and restaurants compete for Dish of the Year, Best Appetizer, Best Entrée, and Best Dessert.
 
 

The Philadelphia Wine Festival

Join Philadelphia magazine and PA Wine & Spirits Stores at the Lincoln Financial Field and sample hundreds of wines at the most anticipated tasting event of the year.
 
 

Best of Philly 2011 iPhone App

For your iPhone: Keep the city's best restaurants, shops and services at your fingertips! Browse five years of winners including our brand-new 2011 list. Click to download now!
 
 
 
 
 

To view this page, you must be using Internet Explorer 7 or higher. Please visit microsoft.com for more information.