1978 Called. It Wants Its Newspaper Back

All big-city newspapers have been hurt by the rise of the Internet, declining ad sales, and an economy gone south. But the brain trust at the Inquirer and Daily News has a deeper problem: They think we still need their papers to find out what’s going on

Text Size: A | A | A
By Steve Volk

Perhaps newspaper companies need to begin thinking of themselves as curators. Their job is to provide a single space in which a variety of writers post print and video content within particular specialties: In this formulation, Will Bunch might provide national political commentary; the Daily News’s Chris Brennan would offer local political reporting and writing; the Inquirer’s Andrew Maykuth would cover the police. But Bunch, Brennan and Maykuth will need to be as comfortable offering opinion as they are facts. They’ll need to be good in front of a camera and responsive to reader commentary, approaching their audiences as participants in the coverage they provide. And the company that employs them will have to treat each of them as a stand-alone business rather than a brick in the wall.

To take the music analogy a step further, the New Journalists of the 21st century face a task similar to Bob Dylan’s when he traded his acoustic guitar for an electric. They must remake themselves and challenge the old ideal, in this case of the objective reporter whose opinions and perspective were supposed to have no bearing on coverage. Daily papers need to make these changes now, themselves, or the entrepreneurs out there conducting interactive experiments will erode their readership even further.

In San Francisco, a website dubbed Spot.us is asking readers to finance coverage of local issues, from the aftermath of an oil spill to why no dog park exists in Pacifica.

In Seattle, a two-person start-up called Instant Journalist enables anyone, anywhere, to create and manage an online community of citizen reporters.

Here in Philadelphia, Joey Sweeney at Philebrity and Jonathan Valania at Phawker are paying the rent with blogs that speak directly to readers left cold by the coverage daily newspapers provide. These sites aren’t yielding big loot, but how easy might it be for someone to start the kind of grassroots site Bunch envisions, one that could boast the right DNA for online growth?

Well, if a start-up could afford a couple of web designers and nine reporters, it could cover the city’s four major sports teams, police, local and national politics, music and restaurants. It could also invite citizens to join in, enabling them to post their own stories and photos about neighborhood developments, school board meetings, whatever strikes their fancy. And who knows? As the enterprise grows, it might even hire some of them. This is, needless to say, pure conjecture. But these solutions are, like the Internet, founded on the same egalitarian principles journalists love to espouse. In essentially placing readers right there in the room with journalists, they are also a threat to every reporter’s ego, and the old idea of authoritativeness that the daily paper traditionally represents.

 
 
Originally published in Philadelphia Magazine, February 2009

  • Anonymous

    However, in some situations the term "real estate" refers to the land and fixtures together, as distinguished from "real property," referring to ownership rights of the land itself. The terms real estate and real property are used primarily in common law, while civil law jurisdictions refer instead to immovable property.Adamreal estate

  • Nancy

    I watched Tierney for years on the local Sunday morning new show and all I saw was his irrepressible arrogance – no charisma in sight. Defending the indefensible Catholic church in the abuse scandal, all the so-called Republican values of cut-throat capitalism – who could fail to see what the paper would come to? I could never have predicted John Yoo though. That's typical Tierney. Let him live with that legacy.

  • Mike

    Well, I just read this entire 10-page story. It was fascinating. I loved it. And I didn't pay a single cent for it, nor does it compel me to subscribe, and … were there ads on any of the pages? I didn't see them. So, how exactly is phillymag going to sustain its own future again?

  • anika

    Hi,This is anika. i newly join this site. its very useful to others. and this topic is very interested. but I dont know this topic.====================anikaEquity Loans

  • Nikola

    The Philadelphia Inquirer and Daily news are low-quality publications that are full of sloppy journalism and errors. Having an egomaniac mismanaging at the top isn't helping either.

  • Robert

    I am a fanatical business news reader and I want to know how THE paper in the 5th largest city in the country routinely has less than 3 pages to its business section?

  • Hannah

    I cancelled my Inquirer subscription because there was no paper there – a virtual pamphlet with some stories from the AP newswire. What kind of a city has such a poor newspaper?

  • Anonymous

    The Inquirer doesn't need a bailout, it needs to stop publishing. This latest tactic proves the paper has no credibility. I stopped it two years ago when they ended the suburban coverage. They treated their suburban staffers, who battled the company and the guild for equal pay, like second class citizens, and then they laid them off. Some were there for twenty years. And let's not forget the age discrimination suit by the seven writers that was settled out of court. The Wal-Mart of newspapers is a joke, and needs to call it a day.

  • Jim

    Newspapers have less than maybe at best 10 years of life. I was a journalist for 30 years – worked at the Inquirer 20 years – I would never ever ever for a $1 million go back!! The management treat people like dirt! I entered health care and I wake up happy every morning – blessed to be away from the stress of wondering if today is the day the paper closes. Please – reporters and photographers – GET OUT NOW!!! No one – NO ONE – who has left would ever return- I dare the magazine to find even 1 person who regrets leaving the newsroom!!!God bless the poor souls still working at the Inquirer!!

  • Will T.

    "Prospective clients feel the diminution of the newspaper simply by picking it up. And they understand that fewer pages mean fewer other businesses are advertising" Same can be said for Philly mag, the January issue had as much the girth as a Sunday church pamphlet. All print media is dying fast, a city magazine in a dwindling city is no exception.

  • david

    You should take the advice of Stu Bykofsky and not GIVE the paper away on line. that includes Philly Mag! i was just able to print the article that Steve Volk wrote in there about the newspaper, "1978 Called", for NOTHING!!!! why but if i can get it for free?! its been peoples mentality for how long? i wanted to get the obituary of a cousin that died in Utah and i got a very small taste of it but when i went to look at the whole thing, I HAD TO BUT IT FOR $13!! i think Tierney should SERIOUSLY think about going that way.

  • Lisa

    The DN and Ink might want to try what other newspapers have been relying on to sell papers and advertising for hundreds of years now, through good times and bad — actually writing for the people who buy it and need to advertise. While fashionable, circa 1974, to "afflict the comfortable," it is in fact the comfortable who read papers and advertise. Those of us who live in the city find that not every nonprofit is honest, not every public housing resident clean and sober, not every homeless guy just a man in need of one good break and a sandwich to turn his life around. Not everyone who wanted Obama to win was ready to start a "race war," if he lost (Fatimah Ali), not everyone who loses a house to foreclosure could ever have managed a mortgage and ownership on even the most favorable terms (Fatimah Ali lost her house because she lost the paperwork needed to refi). Not everyone thinks that Kenny Gamble is great, Odunde is worth the tax payer dollars, and that OHCD provides critical serv

  • Diana

    In suggesting that print media is an old man's game, you forgot that Jared Kushner (Mr. Ivanka Trump) bought the NY Observer for $10 mil in 2005. He was about 24 at the time.

  • Ron

    The most prescient comment is that they paid based on outdated formulas. So did a lot of other buyers (Minneapolis, for one). But papers are still quite profitable on an operating basis, so Chapter 11 is a real and logical possibility. Tough on the creditors, but once the debt service fits the value, papers just may come out OK. Still, new management may be needed to make newspapers more than the "legacy" toys of outsized egos.