King Kenny

Nearly two decades ago, legendary music producer Kenny Gamble moved from a mansion in Gladwyne back to South Philly, living out his message of peace, love and harmony by rebuilding his old stomping ground. So why do some people say that Kenny Gamble isn’t good?

Posted on December 2007   Page 1 of 5
Text Size: A | A | A
 
Photography by Paul Pugliese

Even strolling along the sidewalk, nodding to passers-by, Kenny Gamble exudes a certain grandness. He moves with a royal manner, as though nothing on Broad Street could slow him down, or make him walk any faster.

He’s tall and broad, and wears an all-black tunic and a black crown cap called a kufi. His black horn-rimmed glasses recall Malcolm X.

We met recently at Philadelphia International Records on the corner of Broad and Spruce streets, where Gamble and his musical partner, Leon Huff, produced hit after hit in the 1970s. The music faded for a couple of decades, but it’s resurging now, unexpectedly. There’s a new souvenir shop on Broad Street, gleaming new neon signs, and music spilling out onto the sidewalk.

Gamble, 64, entered the building like a king entering his fortress. Security guards offered reverent greetings, and Gamble strode down a hallway plated in gold and platinum records. He doesn’t walk these halls as often as he once did; these days, he works more as a land developer in South Philadelphia. He once wrote this lyric:

Wake up all the builders,
Time to build a new land;
I know we can do it
If we all lend a hand. …


“I’m living the music now,” he said. “The music has inspired me so, through my life, that I don’t take it for granted.”

He pulled keys from his pocket as he approached the only nondescript feature of his office building: a cream-colored door. He opened the door, which was as thick as a bank vault’s, and revealed a second door, which swung the opposite way and was equally thick. Inside that door there was a security monitor, which displayed footage from 16 security cameras.

The first thing I saw inside Gamble’s office — the first thing that seized my eye, among many contenders — was a wall-size painting, done mostly in purple.

“I commissioned that,” Gamble said. “Took the lady four years to paint it.”

The painting is important, and so bears description: Near the bottom there is a city, small, as though seen from a great distance. It could be any city, except as I leaned closer, I saw that the artist must have used a very narrow brush for such fine detail; one of the buildings looked a lot like Independence Hall. “And look,” Gamble said, growing more animated. “There’s City Hall, and the Art Museum. All the landmarks.”

The miniature Philadelphia sits on what appears to be a roiling bed of molten lava. “The earth is rumbling, shifting around,” Gamble said. “The city is troubled.”

Up from the city — and this is where things get interesting — bubbles float skyward, each containing the face of an anguished soul. “Look at them,” Gamble said sadly. “But look — look where they’re going!”

 


Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Next

 

User Comments:

Universal Companies creates more blight than it fixes -- they won't finish what they started in areas that are booming
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 12:21 AM
COMMENT:
Chinatown owners don't get a discount on their property taxes, or have a clause in their RDA redevelopment agreements removed that states a drop dead date by which property given by the city must be finished. The Royal Theater is just one of dozens of vacant, blighted properties that kill property values, and therefore take revenue from the city that could be used for schools and programs. Kind of an odd method of someone claiming to want to better the city, don't you think?
No way to objectively judge Universal's performance
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 12:29 AM
COMMENT:
I was hoping this article would attempt to objectively judge Universal's performance per amount of money given to it over the years. Far from being an out of pocket venture, Universal received millions upon millions in HOPE I through to the present incarnation of federal block grants and other loan or housing money to renovate. Compared with what they promised, and with what they still hold that is unrenovated, unused, or just vacant, Universal is not up to par with other housing nonprofits such as Habitat for Humanity, RHD, and others. Even the market place itself is a better performer of offering affordable housing to rent or buy than Universal is. I'm surprised that Universal veered into market rate, for profit housing. Was government funding used for that? What is the cost per unit of housing? What other concrete benchmarks have been reached, and what is the timeline? That Universal's public finances are limited only to what it must file with the federal government. Universa
Universal is an expensive ornament in the world of low income housing
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 12:57 AM
COMMENT:
As nonprofits go, Universal seems OK with not taking care of what it owns, letting drugs be sold in front of its vacant lots and empty housing, and not paying its fair share in property taxes so critical for good schools. If a property is vacant for years, it holds equity to a fraction of what the surrounding houses and businesses could bring in for city and school revenue. Nutter has to grow the tax base, unlike Street, who would happily devastate the tax base if it could result in campaign contributions. Pay to play for RDA property and considerations is still pay to play. Getting public trust assets and funds with no requirement for an annual report, no requirement for not kicking back campaign contributions, and no deadline to use or lose the property, as the RDA does with other recipients, is wrong. Also wrong is the way the RDA won't allow these properties to be competitively bidded upon, either as parcels (which is its mandate) or singly. You end up with one recipie
Why the new agey re-segregation of the neighborhoods?
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:05 AM
COMMENT:
Why is Universal so far behind in what it promised to do? There is no reason that the market builds a house in 14 months, but Universal takes 4 years, 8 years, 11 years, or simply refuses to budge. Is their budgeting so awful? Are their employees stealing from them? What is it that prevents Universal from keeping pace with other nonprofits and builders, and when complaints mount from the community, they trot out this old dinosaur from the seventies. Soul Train is not going to nail a 2 x 4, Mr. Gamble. Is it possible that a religio-socio-cultural movement is not what is needed in construction? Diversity works, if you let it.
Content of Character?
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:10 AM
COMMENT:
I wish people would look up on www.hallwatch.org what Gamble and Universal owns, then see how much of it is still classed as vacant. Then look at what they pay in property taxes relative to the others on the same block. Why is the city hurting itself to help Universal and Kenny Gamble? If he is a businessman, why does he need special treatment on his costs and his performance? With equal rights come equal responsibilities. The most helpful way to get this property built and help the long term residents who've held properties for years but have suffered from Universal not getting it together is to treat Universal in a colorblind fashion. Content of character, and all that. It doesn't help any low income AA resident to give this property to a wealthy friend of Street who can't get the job done. Street wanted to give this concession to a minority -- too bad it's always the same ten people over and over again.
Put down the ganja, Mr. G.
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:16 AM
COMMENT:
Wow. Now I've really heard it all. If "preservation" was the goal for the Royal, they've botched that one as well. The Royal is falling apart. It's more wrecked than it's ever been, and if the city give these crackpots the lots at Broad and Washington, which I understand the House of Blues would like to use, than I will never vote Democrat for any reason ever again. I have no problem with the Nation of Islam, I just think they are robbing banks legally now. Will the city have the cojones to press charges against these people for theft by deception on the federal felony level? Because the amount of property they got, and money, and the scant work done with it, all window dressing, and all the defunding of Universal by all the most reputable funding sources had got to tell us something. The local Democrats have to put down that ganja too.
Universalville not the answer to the needs of the community
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:23 AM
COMMENT:
The most successful, self-sustaining, neighborhoods are the ones that are income diverse, race diverse, and comprised of the new and the old. Why does Universal, and Gamble, fight that? Why does the city allow this? Universalville is never going to work, because the whole concept violates the tenets of good urban planning.
Of course other people sell goods and services to different people
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:23 AM
COMMENT:
Of course the Irish, Russians, and Puerto Ricans sell to people "outside their community." You can't have a business if you choose to only work with one kind of people. I suspect that is the source of most of Universal's troubles. Gamble's economic view is unworkable. If you ignore the market, and focus on nonmarket variables, you reward the things that are not going to get the job done, and ignore the things that do. This reverse racism is just as much a failure of merit based, American economic values as any racism. What would Cosby say? Juan Williams? John McWhorter? Fortunately, the drive to create a separate but equal Philly that romanticizes the segregated ghetto before it has finally lost its grip on the collective imagination.
Worst properties in SWCC -- mostly belong to Gamble or Universal -- why don't they get fined?
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:42 AM
COMMENT:
All of South Street looks good except for the empty lots and vacant buildings owned by Universal. Is this because Universal can't get property to fix up if there is no more blight in the area? Why the city is not fining these guys, or, in come cases, even levying the property tax for the year those properties were conveyed in, is a mystery to me. If Gamble loves the city, why is he cheating it, and its citizens, schools, safety, and growth? Every business has to pay property taxes. If Gamble wants good schools, why is the Universal Charter School consistently underperforming? Vallas had taken away control of the other schools held by Universal's education management company for failure to meet standards. What happened to the businesses that were supposed to be created by Universal? Shuttered and sold. It would be super if Gamble's vision had some basis in reality, but the reality is that it is a poor performing alternate version of the same city services only costing the c
 
Philadelphia It List

Philadelphia magazine's Philly Cooks

Join Philadelphia magazine for a unique tasting experience as the city’s top chefs and restaurants compete for Dish of the Year, Best Appetizer, Best Entrée, and Best Dessert.
 
 

The Philadelphia Wine Festival

Join Philadelphia magazine and PA Wine & Spirits Stores at the Lincoln Financial Field and sample hundreds of wines at the most anticipated tasting event of the year.
 
 

Best of Philly 2011 iPhone App

For your iPhone: Keep the city's best restaurants, shops and services at your fingertips! Browse five years of winners including our brand-new 2011 list. Click to download now!
 
 
 
 
 

To view this page, you must be using Internet Explorer 7 or higher. Please visit microsoft.com for more information.