Is It Just Us, Or Are Kids Getting Really Stupid?

They don’t read. They can’t spell. They spend all their time playing computer games and texting and hanging out with one another on Facebook. But the problem is much worse than you think, because the way your kids live now is rewiring their brains

Posted on December 2010   Page 1 of 9
Text Size: A | A | A
 
Illustration by Matt Mahurin

Two autumns ago, in my son Jake’s junior year of high school, he took an AP English course. Junior year was bad for him and me — we never seemed to have anything nice to say to one another. But Jake did like to read, and it occurred to me at some point that perhaps I could use his AP English course to connect with him. Surely I’d read the same books he was reading, since the high-school reading list was carved in stone sometime in the early 1950s. So I asked him: What are you reading in AP English?  

The Great Gatsby,” he said.

 “Do you … like it?” I asked delicately, thrilled to be having what was almost a conversation with my teenage son.

“I don’t really like the actor who plays Gatsby,” he said. “He’s got these weird bumps on his face that keep distracting me.”

“The actor?”

“We’re not actually reading the book,” Jake informed me. “We haven’t read a book all semester. We watch the movies instead.”

It sort of made sense, once I calmed down and thought about it. It was hard to get kids to read back when I was in high school; what must it be like now, when there are iPods and iPhones and Internet and cable TV? Better to have seen Robert Redford pretend to be Gatsby than never to have known Gatsby at all.

Just the same, I was glad when, for his senior year, Jake proposed taking an English course at the local community college. Come September, he and a buddy drove to the college every Monday night and sat for three hours in English 101 — where they never once read a book. They watched movies instead.

Jake got an A- in the course.

We live in interesting times. In the past decade, the number of college grads who can interpret a food label has fallen from 40 percent to 30 percent. An American child is six times more likely to know who won American Idol than the name of the Speaker of the House. (For more bad news, see the sidebar on page 59.) Reading and writing scores both fell on the 2008 SATs. Not long ago, a high-school teacher in California handed out an assignment that required students to use a ruler — and discovered not a single one of them knew how.  

What in the world is going on with our kids?

Bring the subject up in any group of parents around Philadelphia, and you’ll hear the same thing: Children today seem, well, dumber than they used to. They don’t know the most basic stuff: who fought against whom in World War II, how many pints are in a quart, and in Jake’s case, the days of the week. (He’s shaky on the months, too.) They may be taking every AP and Honors course their schools offer, but they can’t tell you who invented pasteurization. (They do know who invented Facebook, because they saw the movie The Social Network.) They spend an average of eight and a half hours a day in front of screens — computer screens, TV screens, iPhone screens. Add in eight hours of sleep and seven of school, and that leaves half an hour when their senses aren’t under siege — just enough time for a shower.

 


Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next

 

User Comments:

9 pages?
Posted by Tony | Nov. 27, 2010 at 7:50 PM
COMMENT:
It's funny that those that STILL read, have to pay the click price. This article is fascinating, but could EASILY be one long web page. Instead we have to click 9 times to get through. and get 9 sets of ads. Just another way text and reading will die.
Flynn Effect
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 28, 2010 at 8:05 AM
COMMENT:
Flynn Effect. Nuff said.
This again? Really???
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 28, 2010 at 10:29 AM
COMMENT:
A generation's learning style does not change...there are plenty of kids who read books, socialize, etc. Academia is studing social networkers and making statements on all kids. This article reminds me of my father, who walked uphill to school...both ways...in the snow.
Kids Getting Stupider
Posted by Joe | Nov. 28, 2010 at 1:24 PM
COMMENT:
Nah in PA they've always been a little behind;
Really?
Posted by Anna | Nov. 28, 2010 at 3:43 PM
COMMENT:
This reads like a half-hearted attempt to stir up fear. As a "stupid kid" who is constantly reading in school, writing papers, and doing all the other things this digital generation supposedly doesn't do, I think I can say that this is full of crap. We actually analyzed Bauerlein's book in my linguistics class, and it was determined that he provides no legitimate evidence to support his claims. Also, can you really argue that the internet gives kids a NARROWER worldview? The internet allows us stupid kids to really learn about all the sides of issues--quickly and easily-- instead of taking one person's word for it. In the old-time small towns, it was hard to find a differing opinion, and prejudice ran rampant. If your kid doesn't know the days of the week, I hate to tell you, but maybe you should take a little responsibility, instead of blaming "kids these days."
Really?
Posted by Anna | Nov. 28, 2010 at 3:43 PM
COMMENT:
This reads like a half-hearted attempt to stir up fear. As a "stupid kid" who is constantly reading in school, writing papers, and doing all the other things this digital generation supposedly doesn't do, I think I can say that this is full of crap. We actually analyzed Bauerlein's book in my linguistics class, and it was determined that he provides no legitimate evidence to support his claims. Also, can you really argue that the internet gives kids a NARROWER worldview? The internet allows us stupid kids to really learn about all the sides of issues--quickly and easily-- instead of taking one person's word for it. In the old-time small towns, it was hard to find a differing opinion, and prejudice ran rampant. If your kid doesn't know the days of the week, I hate to tell you, but maybe you should take a little responsibility, instead of blaming "kids these days."
Sources?
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 29, 2010 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I'd really like to see your sources. The "facts" you cited at the end about connecting on the Internet being linked to depression are incorrect. In fact, the opposite is true: children who use the Internet as an extension to their social life actually connect better with their peers. The only time depression comes into play is if the child exhibited preexisting antisocial behavior. (Source: Desjarlais, M., & Willoughby, T. 2010. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 896-905.) Additionally, Internet use has been shown to improve numerous cognitive abilities. In longitudinal studies, students who regularly used the Internet had stronger reading and writing skills and better GPAs. (Source: Jackson, L.A, von Eye, A., & Biocca, F.A. 2003. First Latin American Web Congress.)
Where did you find these kids?
Posted by Caroline | Nov. 29, 2010 at 8:25 AM
COMMENT:
Because I'm a high school student in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, and I can guarantee you that almost every single english-speaking student in my school has known the days of the week since the 1st grade. Also, we have read books in every single english class since the third grade.
NOT TRUE
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 29, 2010 at 9:04 AM
COMMENT:
This whole article is purely composed of half-halfheartedly searched research and a mother who couldn't teach her child the days of the week. As a highschool student, I would know first hand if we never read books, was always plugged in to electronics, or didn't know the days of the week. The truth is we DO know the days of the week--i bet of you poled 20 kids in the philly area they would know the days of the week. The fact that you're using your dumb kid as an example of teh teen population is just stupid.
What can they do?
Posted by Harry | Nov. 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM
COMMENT:
The article quotes some education professors who say it is ok if kids are not learning basic skills. They define that as a different education. The test should be what can the kids do? After you read a book or article can you summarize, discuss, debate, etc? What can you do - write, develop plans and solutions for problems, design something, create something, build something, etc?
WAIT A MINUTE
Posted by Lauren | Nov. 29, 2010 at 2:30 PM
COMMENT:
I bought this right up to: "and in Jake’s case, the days of the week. (He’s shaky on the months, too.) " This kid is a JUNIOR in HIGH SCHOOL. And WATCHING MOVIES IN HIGH SCHOOL? 1) the kids going to a dummy high school. My poor daughter is ALWAYS reading and writing papers out the wazzo and 2) I think Jake might have a learning disability or something. Shaky on the months and days of the week? A junion in HS is like 16 years old. Sorry big fail for this article. Big fail for the lame old "kids these days" bullcrap.
Adults the Ones Getting Dumber
Posted by Tyler | Nov. 29, 2010 at 9:14 PM
COMMENT:
How can you possibly sit back and write this essay when your generation is clearly to blame for this "issue" that apparently plagues the high schools today? 1) We are not responsible for educating ourselves. 2) If we are watching movies, we are most likely reading the books along with them, analyzing plot themes along the way, and writing massive analytical papers. The amount of work done today is easily 10x what it used to be. 3) Weak unresearched facts based one-sidedly mean nothing. More than 30% of Adult Americans cannot name 5 countries in Africa. And you elected a Senator from Massachusetts that thinks an island can "tip." (Don't believe me? Google it.) Stop stereotyping and making painful generalizations, as well as setting a bad example for us. Some of us want to succeed. atb414@yahoo.com
Adults the Ones Getting Dumber
Posted by Tyler | Nov. 29, 2010 at 9:14 PM
COMMENT:
How can you possibly sit back and write this essay when your generation is clearly to blame for this "issue" that apparently plagues the high schools today? 1) We are not responsible for educating ourselves. 2) If we are watching movies, we are most likely reading the books along with them, analyzing plot themes along the way, and writing massive analytical papers. The amount of work done today is easily 10x what it used to be. 3) Weak unresearched facts based one-sidedly mean nothing. More than 30% of Adult Americans cannot name 5 countries in Africa. And you elected a Senator from Massachusetts that thinks an island can "tip." (Don't believe me? Google it.) Stop stereotyping and making painful generalizations, as well as setting a bad example for us. Some of us want to succeed. atb414@yahoo.com
In the words of stupid gaming kids, "Epic Fail!"
Posted by Zach | Nov. 30, 2010 at 7:18 AM
COMMENT:
Good educators understand that you must adapt to those which you seek to teach rather than trying to force them to adapt to a rigid old archetype of top down learning. It isn't that youth are stupid, it is that majority of educators and higher learning institutions aren't creative/smart enough to find ways to adapt to better teach classic much needed information.
In the words of stupid gaming kids, "Epic Fail!"
Posted by Zach | Nov. 30, 2010 at 7:18 AM
COMMENT:
Good educators understand that you must adapt to those which you seek to teach rather than trying to force them to adapt to a rigid old archetype of top down learning. It isn't that youth are stupid, it is that majority of educators and higher learning institutions aren't creative/smart enough to find ways to adapt to better ways to teach classic much needed information.
Alison
Posted by alison | Nov. 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM
COMMENT:
I literally could not even read this entire article due to the broad-based judgement as well as uninformed nature of the author. As a gen-y-er...I am in between both generations. The reality is this: the school system that put me in MOUNDS of debt is old. It is broken. The only thing I gained from it was how to socially interact with my peers and teachers. NONE OF THE STUFF I LEARNED IN SCHOOL I ACTUALLY USE IN MY LIFE. NONE OF IT. The reality is this: the world is changing--shocker!--and our children are moving faster than the adults are. They can weed out useless crap and focus on what needs to be done. It's so freakin ridiculous to call our future generations stupid. Congratulations, you have morphed into your parents and grandparents. Things change people. This is nothing new. But apparently you are so stupid, you didn't take that into account as a baseline for why kids behaviors are--gasp--different than yours were. How stupid can you be?
Just because your kid's retarded...
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 30, 2010 at 2:52 PM
COMMENT:
...doesn't mean you should generalize an entire generation. The fact that your son was in an AP English class and yet did not read books and, Christ, did not know the days of the week, means that both his school AND his parents are failing him. You're so quick to pin the blame on the rapid advancement of technology, when in fact NONE of this could have been possible without the labor of your generation. YOUR GENERATION created the world of today and it's now up to MY GENERATION to live with it.
From on "old timer" who accidentally clicked "don't like"
Posted by Stephanie | Nov. 30, 2010 at 2:54 PM
COMMENT:
I'm not even an old timer - I'm 27. And I find myself caught between the world of high schoolers, whom I teach, and the world of my parents who are just as overwhelmed as I by the overstimulating nature of technology. It definitely doesn't sit right with me at all. I hate the ADD side of my nature; it makes accomplishing larger, time-consuming tasks more difficult. But at least, if I really force myself, I can concentrate as long as I need to on my long term goals. I don't, however, see that ability in the majority of the kids I teach. I see that as being neither evolution nor progress.
From on "old timer" who accidentally clicked "don't like"
Posted by Stephanie | Nov. 30, 2010 at 2:55 PM
COMMENT:
I'm not even an old timer - I'm 27. And I find myself caught between the world of high schoolers, whom I teach, and the world of my parents who are just as overwhelmed as I by the overstimulating nature of technology. It definitely doesn't sit right with me at all. I hate the ADD side of my nature; it makes accomplishing larger, time-consuming tasks more difficult. But at least, if I really force myself, I can concentrate as long as I need to on my long term goals. I don't, however, see that ability in the majority of the kids I teach. I see that as being neither evolution nor progress.
Author failed as a parent.
Posted by Firstname | Nov. 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM
COMMENT:
Your son doesn't know the days of the week or all the months and you're not sure why he's a moron? It's because of you. You have failed your son.
really?
Posted by Dave | Dec. 1, 2010 at 4:00 AM
COMMENT:
I think there is an intelligent piece to write on this theme. This, however, certainly isn't it. As a teacher, I don't witness any more playing of movies than when I was a kid and only, of course, as supplements to actual reading. The factors mentioned by the author certainly affect the way kids socialize, relate, enter romantic relationships, etc, but they still learn! Texting may be changing their brain waves, but it's not eliminating them entirely. Maybe the author should just be worried about her own kid, who by her description is the dumbest person in the history of the world. What lame journalism.
misleading!
Posted by Kimberly | Dec. 1, 2010 at 8:28 AM
COMMENT:
I don't know of ANY parents in the Philadelphia area who would say that kids are dumber. I am seeing high school kids work many more hours outside of school (while maintaining active in athletics, scouting, religious groups, etc)on homework and group projects than ever before(many of which make very creative use of technology). I regularly see books that I read in college coming home, at both the middle and high school levels. I agree that conversation skills are lacking since so many choose to text or Facebook message nstead of actually talk to others, but as to academics, kids today (at least in the Philadelphia suburbs) are worlds ahead of where we were just 20 years ago. I am surprised that PHILADELPHIA Magazine would publish an article with such a biased and false title and lead.
Listen to the lady
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 1, 2010 at 12:30 PM
COMMENT:
Hmmm.. much defensiveness on the part of offended (mostly teen?) READERS -- perhaps NOT the screen-obsessed teens being written about in the article? However, here's the worry for this mom. Real life doesn't come with push buttons. Problems are complex in the making and complex in the solutions. A generation rewired and conditioned to expect instant gratification and one-click consequences to their actions is going to feel perpetually BORED and intolerant of the time and perseverance it takes to solve most of the challenges thrown their way, be it in relationships, making a livelihood, as parents, in geopolitics, you name it. It's not just the kids being rewired, it's their parents as well who find YouTube a better source for info than a newspaper or even, God forbid, an actual dialogue with knowledgeable people. Evidence? recent election results won via fear-mongering sound bites, anger at the administration for failing to cure the decades-in-the-making economy in two years, and more knowledge about who won Dancing with the Stars than who won that election. It's tempting to paint all technology with the same bad brush. But the internet and digital tools aren't the problem. How folks use them to develop...
continued from last post
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM
COMMENT:
. But the internet and digital tools aren't the problem. How folks use them to develop and feed always accessible addictions IS a problem. Violent gaming, designed by well-paid industrial psychologists and manufacturers to be addictive, wires kids' brains for levels of stimulation that real life can't possibly match. An inability converse with the person right next to you because you feel compelled to text or check facebook every few minutes meets my definition of obsessive-compulsive behavior. If it was a drug filling that need, we'd intervene. But the 24/7 onslaught and inability to control the substance causes way too many parents to throw in the towel. No solutions here, but we dismiss this as 'just a phase' or generation-gap business-as-usual at our kids' peril.
Interesting read
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 1, 2010 at 9:42 PM
COMMENT:
While I disagree on a number of your points, as a senior in college I can understand why you feel so apprehensive about the incoming generation. While I advise you not to worry so much about it, the idea of completely dismissing it isn't a smart decision either. From my perspective, each new generation shapes the world into something that best suits them while the older generations shake their heads in disapproval. Yet somehow both generations are able to coexist. So while high schoolers might need someone to tell them to get off the phone, maybe more parents should start linking in.
Continued from two and three posts above
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM
COMMENT:
FIRST! The first commenter seems to be putting the blame on our generation (the "stupid" kids) for the bad election. Here are the facts: Far less voters under the age of 25 voted this year than voted in 2008, therefore it is the older generations who are actually to blame. SECOND! About the article itself. None of the "facts" she brought up had sources, like mentioned above, and none had actual numbers associated with them. THIRD! Because we have access to all of this information, we are able to have, get this, MORE INTELLIGENT CONVERSATIONS because we know more, and we do have to sort through a ton of information to get the important stuff, which, get this, IS CRITICAL THINKING! I am very surprised that ANY magazine would have this article actually published. Sincerely, A Very Intelligent Teenager, Thank You Very Much!
Disappointing and Misleading
Posted by Bevin | Dec. 3, 2010 at 7:35 AM
COMMENT:
Interesting, but SO much misinformation in the article - for being about focus, it's surprisingly unfocused and circular. For instance this paragraph "The Nielsen Norman Group, a consulting firm whose founder was deemed by the New York Times to be “the guru of Web page ‘usability,’” has done extensive research into what makes websites successful. Its advice to clients? Nothing higher than a sixth-grade reading level on the home page, and eighth-grade on subsequent pages. One idea per paragraph." has NOTHING to do with teens. That's been the advice given since web usability became a "thing" - long before the millenials were out of diapers. The average newspaper has to be written to a what is it 8th grade reading level? And it has been that way for...EVER. I love how it insinuates that the polarization of America has something to do with technology - it's total and utter bullpucky because in reality, that's a boomer+ mess, one of the smaller groups on the internet - not a teen problem. In fact, the millenials and below are MORE community oriented and willing to reach across the aisle...not less. If the author would like to meet children who are both technologically connected and avid...
Oops sorry - poor usability no warning
Posted by Bevin | Dec. 3, 2010 at 7:41 AM
COMMENT:
What I meant to say was if the author would like to meet children who are both active online socially, great researchers, readers and can translate quarts into gallons, know the days of the week, know the months, can discuss books quite critically etc. well then you just come over to my house, and you'll find something different in those "stupid" kids. This is a terribly disappointing and poorly researched article meant to stir up fear and anger. Now, who is responsible for the polarization, again?
She doesn't analyze her own role in this...
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM
COMMENT:
Who bought her son his cell phone, who paid for his WoW account, who pays for the internet bill. I find it interesting this author is eager to point the finger, but fails to consider her own role in the this equation. It says more about her need to believe she is a good parent than the role technology plays. Maybe a bit more structure to her children's lives that involved non-screen time would do more than blaming Farmville for the down fall of Western Civilization.
Questions
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 4, 2010 at 10:51 AM
COMMENT:
What is with this? Where did you get the average of 3,339 texts per month? Who did you survey for that? Who did you survey for the 440 friends on Facebook? Or How many people for the average, two? I'm twelve years old i have read The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and other such classics. How can you say as a nation kids are getting dumber if multiple if in my school and others the stress on school work is just increasing?
Questions
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 4, 2010 at 10:51 AM
COMMENT:
What is with this? Where did you get the average of 3,339 texts per month? Who did you survey for that? Who did you survey for the 440 friends on Facebook? Or How many people for the average, two? I'm twelve years old i have read The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and other such classics. How can you say as a nation kids are getting dumber if multiple if in my school and others the stress on school work is just increasing?
Questions
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 4, 2010 at 10:51 AM
COMMENT:
What is with this? Where did you get the average of 3,339 texts per month? Who did you survey for that? Who did you survey for the 440 friends on Facebook? Or How many people for the average, two? I'm twelve years old i have read The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and other such classics. How can you say as a nation kids are getting dumber if multiple if in my school and others the stress on school work is just increasing?
Questions
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 4, 2010 at 10:51 AM
COMMENT:
What is with this? Where did you get the average of 3,339 texts per month? Who did you survey for that? Who did you survey for the 440 friends on Facebook? Or How many people for the average, two? I'm twelve years old i have read The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and other such classics. How can you say as a nation kids are getting dumber if multiple if in my school and others the stress on school work is just increasing?
Perhaps...
Posted by Rick | Dec. 5, 2010 at 12:54 PM
COMMENT:
Maybe the kids aren't deficient in knowing the American Idol winner moreso than the Speaker of the House. Maybe they have been just blocking out the horror of who the Speaker has been for the last 4 years.
C for effort
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 5, 2010 at 5:18 PM
COMMENT:
Here, we find yet another Philadelphia Magazine article with an ever-changing thesis, misguided arguments, and an ad hominem title concocted to sell as many copies as possible. I get up at 5 AM, leave for school at 7, leave school around 6 PM (sometimes as late as 10 PM) and then I work until midnight. I would say that this schedule is typical of most of the other students at my school. For the record, my junior English (not even an honors class) actually read The Great Gatsby. We didn't even watch the movie because we decided that it would ruin our ability to analyze the novel.
Obv. people spend way to much time.....
Posted by R.J. | Dec. 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM
COMMENT:
As you can see the person here is not really trying to relay the fact all kids that use the internet are dumb or it's not a useful tool. If you would read a little more carefully you would understand the author points, all the great things that can be accomplished when using the internet/ technology. The reasoning behind this article is why people are quick to line up and defend such a culture that doesn't read and pay attention as much as they had too before (and some response prove that point) because everything is right there, given to them, they don't have to work for anything anymore, something as simple as knowing what day it is; because they can look it up on their cell phone. I work in higher education and that is the honest truth. In a perfect world, students should harness the power of the internet and convince of our tech. advancements, but yet they have let the advancements take care of them. Only cretin people can realize that, those people usual do or had worked with students or are concerned parents, and the author is one of them.
Kids these days...
Posted by Aife | Dec. 6, 2010 at 6:39 PM
COMMENT:
Circular logic. It's so much fun, isn't it? Sorry, I find this full of ridiculous stereotypes. "Those kids these days. They don't learn anything! We had a paper every other day, and had to walk uphill in the school both ways, juggle extracurricular activities AND keep up a social life." What are you, the Cat in the Hat? "Oh, my son's so absent-minded! He doesn't even know what day of the week it is!” Just because they don't know what day of the week it is, doesn't mean they can't solve complex mathematical formulas that I dare any disgruntled parent to tackle. We have to do it every day. I’m juggling 4 projects as we speak. The internet allows the human race to transfer and utilize parcels of information never available in this scale. With a click you can access billions of documents, but, guess what? To access the information in said documents, you need-Critical thinking skills! Amazing. And you do make a very good point when it comes to our hard-wiring that makes us, as individual human beings, us. It’s different than yours. But that’s the beauty of the human mind. It changes to new circumstance. It adapts.
Wow...
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 7, 2010 at 8:20 AM
COMMENT:
This is from one of the 'stupid' teenagers. You, the writer, is the real idiot.
Wow...
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 7, 2010 at 8:20 AM
COMMENT:
This is from one of the 'stupid' teenagers. You, the writer, is the real idiot.
Very very informative, interesting, and downright frightening
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM
COMMENT:
This is a very scary outlook, and as a 11th grader, I have to say I agree with what you are saying. The new generation, with which I am a part of, albeit an outlier, seems farther apart. In some situations, me, the hermit, can participate better in the real world than my peers. This seems to be a new scary truth, maybe the few people with a much better understanding of the world will rule over the masses of easily confused adults, who will believe whatever they want to here. Another equally eire option would be to have to install classes to TEACH children the 'correct' way to behave, I dread to think how any dictator wanting power would use this to their advantage, it would almost be too easy for them.
Very very informative, interesting, and downright frightening
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM
COMMENT:
This is a very scary outlook, and as a 11th grader, I have to say I agree with what you are saying. The new generation, with which I am a part of, albeit an outlier, seems farther apart. In some situations, me, the hermit, can participate better in the real world than my peers. This seems to be a new scary truth, maybe the few people with a much better understanding of the world will rule over the masses of easily confused adults, who will believe whatever they want to here. Another equally eire option would be to have to install classes to TEACH children the 'correct' way to behave, I dread to think how any dictator wanting power would use this to their advantage, it would almost be too easy for them.
She is 100% correct
Posted by Sheth | Dec. 7, 2010 at 11:57 AM
COMMENT:
The author is on point and the thin skinned kids who are responding angrily are proving it. I've noticed many of the respondents seem to think that having a packed schedule means they are smarter than their parents. Typical of the arrogance she spoke of in the article. Just because you are BUSY, doesn't mean you are smart or capable of problem solving. Not only are attention span shorter but young people increasingly have trouble writing on an adult level. I know someone who worked in HR for Philly school district and she saw firsthand how college grads couldn't even submit resumes and applications that were appropriate for their level of education. Young people today dont even encounter a lot of correct grammar usage because they dont read books or periodicals. They read slang on Facebook and in text messages. Kids today know how to TEST better and get into college- that doesn't mean they have the basic skill set or problem solving abilities they they should have when they graduate HS. The parents of this generation have put their kids on a pedastal and its reflected in the hostile, self righteous responses some HS students have posted on here...
It's lack of sleep/stress more than anything else
Posted by Kate | Dec. 7, 2010 at 9:50 PM
COMMENT:
I'm sorry, but this just isn't true. I learned how to use technology and analyze data in my AP Biology class junior year that my mom didn't see until she was a graduate student. I'm currently rehashing a paper on population ethics that I first wrote for a summer college course. When I have time to read, I make a point of reading in German. My dad has been trying for months to get me to drop from Calc BC to Calc AB so I'll get a proper night's sleep. And you know what? That's pretty normal among my acquaintances/friends (and before I've even touched on clubs). We're all very socially active and extremely adept intellectually. With one exception, I don't know anyone who texts more than 75-100 times a day or spends much more time on the internet than is required for research/reading. Please don't make these generalizations about an entire generation based entirely on your son. PS- We're learning about fairness in writing in my college composition class. We've all been taught to avoid the ad hominem fallacies, generalizations, and circular reasoning that apear in this article. Not trying to be insulting, but if we have our flaws...
Sad yet very true...
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 9, 2010 at 11:39 AM
COMMENT:
What an amazing and thought provoking article. I have had these same thoughts for years now and seeing them so eloquently displayed in this article was so refreshing. I really hope more people and especially those with authority, realize these issues and do something to stop the bleeding. We need to learn how to effectively utilize technology instead of allowing it to turn us into soul lacking addicts. Thank you so much for putting in the time and effort to research and write about this topic.
Wow
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 9, 2010 at 5:04 PM
COMMENT:
As a student in an all girls high school, where there is a 100% college attendance and an A- is considered not very good, i feel that this article , referring to kids as "stupid" is completely unfair. Did you forget to leave out the good amount of kids that do actually enjoy reading? Or the fact that it's the adult that teach the kids these things. The adults that show us the movies, not the kids. And shouldn't a child know well before school the days of the week? I feel the word "stupid" is unfair to the kids who do try and are not glued to screens. And another thing, where do kids get ipods and iphones? Yes, adults. It's the not the kids' fault!!!!!
The Days of the week
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 11, 2010 at 7:47 AM
COMMENT:
The bit about the 6-day schedule resonated with me. I'm 46 but I remember having a 6-day schedule back in Jr. High and commenting with my friends that it had become difficult to remember what day of the week it was - but we always knew if it was day 4 or day 5. Of course, we didn't have cell phones so we could usually remember if it was Wednesday if we tried hard enough.
wait...
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM
COMMENT:
your son does not know the days of the week? really? sounds like a parenting fail if i've ever heard one.
wait...
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM
COMMENT:
your son does not know the days of the week? really? sounds like a parenting fail if i've ever heard one.
Look at all the stirred up Connors
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 13, 2010 at 9:21 PM
COMMENT:
Lol, you really got the megan's and Connors all riled up. They seem to think filing theor day with an endless stream of make work means they are 'smart. They miss the entire point of the article. It would be more impressive if they did one thing, really well, not name a long list of 20 minute scheduled resume padding BS.
What a joke
Posted by Devon | Dec. 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM
COMMENT:
I'm a kid (at least I think I count as one), and I'm pretty damn smart. I know the days of the week in four different languages. I read a book a week. And I loved The Great Gatsby--"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne ceaselessly into the past." Love that line. Maybe the one most meaningful sentence ever writ. Are there idiots amongst my fellow high school and college students? You better believe it. But the rumors of Generation Y's demise have been, to paraphrase Mark Twain, greatly exaggerated. Are there plenty of self-absorbed, anti-intellectual, vacuous, whorish, fame-driven, disrespectful punks? Of course, and MTV surely isn't helping by perpetuating that machine. But the more I reach out to my peers, the more I'm surprised at how many are far more intelligent and intellectually curious than I'd given them credit for. Then again, this is for "Philadelphia" magazine, and that city is just a black hole of culture, independent thought, and ingenuity. Back in New York, we actually reward hard work and creativity, so there may be a bit of a culture divide here.
Nothing new
Posted by jon | Dec. 14, 2010 at 8:55 PM
COMMENT:
This is nothing new. Technology has always dumbed the masses down. There are still some older Professors around who can tell you about the pre and post calculator days and how their students were affected. It gets scarier when the tail end of each generation start teaching in schools. Public schools used to be fine. Nowadays they are systematically brainwashing and retarding children. Enjoy your snooze.
Nothing new
Posted by jon | Dec. 14, 2010 at 8:55 PM
COMMENT:
This is nothing new. Technology has always dumbed the masses down. There are still some older Professors around who can tell you about the pre and post calculator days and how their students were affected. It gets scarier when the tail end of each generation start teaching in schools. Public schools used to be fine. Nowadays they are systematically brainwashing and retarding children. Enjoy your snooze.
Oh the irony
Posted by alex | Dec. 15, 2010 at 10:43 AM
COMMENT:
This is the second long, rather dense article I've read recently that bemoans our increasing inability to read long dense articles. (The other was in Psychology Today) I thought this was just a little ironic. Good read though. I guess my brain is a dinosaur.
Wow.
Posted by Greg | Dec. 15, 2010 at 5:03 PM
COMMENT:
To overgeneralize an ENTIRE generation of people based on your child, who by the way, is "dumb" because of you. You allow him to play World of Warcraft, force him to go outside, etc. (do not blame your son's incompetence as a result of my generation, thank you!) and a select few students of one high school. To go as far as to say that the youth of today are a spawn of ignorance is to sink to the level of those you so "righteously" accuse. I do however, notice a lack of actually citation in your essay. Your comments on direct depression from technological use is misinterpreted. (See click here ) Depression is either caused from an abundance of stress or a pre-existing condition. While there are the stereotypical teenagers of today, the reincarnation of idols such as Paris Hilton, but there are, in quite an abundance, those of us looking to preserve knowledge and rhetoric in hopes of sparing the names of our generation. There are plenty of us who would every once in awhile to quite frequently like to pick up a book, to listen to artist that aren't "Ke$ha", or "Lady Gaga". There are the creative thinkers of...
Ha.
Posted by Shelley | Dec. 16, 2010 at 7:32 AM
COMMENT:
It's funny that people are getting so defensive about what is really an obvious truth. We DON'T require as much of our students these days as people used to require. As a teacher, I can tell you that students DON'T have basic knowledge. I had to teach my 8th graders what a proper noun was. Go to a bookstore and look at an English textbook from before 1960. The level of intellectualism required of students of that period FAR surpasses what is required of them today.
Also. . .
Posted by Shelley | Dec. 16, 2010 at 7:49 AM
COMMENT:
The argument that time spent doing homework equates to the academic rigor of the work is fallacious. Just because something takes you a long time to complete does not mean that it is difficult, it means that YOU do not have the skills or the focus necessary to complete the task in a timely manner. When I was a nanny, I watched the teenage daughters of my family spend HOURS on their homework. In between checking their e-mail, updating their FB status, IMing with 4 friends, and changing the songs on their iTunes. Time taken to complete a task just speaks to the individual's skills, not to the difficulty of the task. A 500 page book might take you several days to finish, but it takes my Ph.D. student friend a few hours. You'll have to come up with a better argument if you want to convince someone that you are actually being challenged in school.
Why generalize?
Posted by Melinad | Dec. 17, 2010 at 6:59 PM
COMMENT:
Its unfair to say all kids don't know the days of the week. believe it or not...MOST DO. Why is it made a generalization? I'm not your son.
Content
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 18, 2010 at 12:32 PM
COMMENT:
Dear Sandy, Interesting article, but the media plays an important role in educating children too, and challenging the education system. Recently, I visited my 11-year-old cousin. We read a quiz in one of the Fall editions of Philadelphia Magazine (I think, I'm not sure) about whether you're "smarter than a 5th grader?" Or "smarter than an 11th grader"? I can't remember at this point. Anyway, one of the questions asked was "Which one is not a continent?" The options were: North America, Australia, China, and (I think) Europe. Behind the page we had all the answers, it said "China." Though I was first confused, I was later appalled that a MAGAZINE absolutely believes that North American and Australia and entirely a continent each! And my cousin, of course, believes it because it's the media! You would know, right? But of course, I didn't buy it. Perhaps I didn't because I was educated in another country, which, btw, also needs education reform. Yet most of my teachers went above and beyond the approved curriculum and encouraged us to challenge official versions. So did our parents. So it's not a question of how many hours kids spend playing computer games (I used to spent...
Read It and Weep: It's True.
Posted by Claudia | Dec. 18, 2010 at 10:00 PM
COMMENT:
I'm a psychology student, and this article is consistent with many studies I've read (The How of Happiness and Stumbling on Happiness both tackle how the brain processes information). What's happening is kids are using less frequently the part of their brains that teach how to think, so that they can move on to something more pleasurable to them. Imagine a lumberjack from the 1860's is suddenly allowed access to a powerful chainsaw. No one could disagree that the muscles in his arms and shoulders would become less toned if he started using the electric saw instead of the heavy axe. The brain works the same way - it is a muscle too. Finding an answer to a homework assignment on Google that took less than one minute to locate does not constitute much mental exercise. As a result, the brain forgets the information for what is a higher priority. The priorities of most children are finishing the unpleasant task of homework and getting on to something more pleasurable - like a video game. In this Information Age, information is not knowledge - even Albert Einstein would tell you that.
Critics
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM
COMMENT:
For those who disagree with the article, you would be more credible if you didn't have such atrocious grammar. Here are some helpful tips: the first letter of each word in a sentence is capitalized. Names of countries and languages like English are also capitalized. You're helping to make the author's point if you can't communicate intelligently.
English Class and Teachers
Posted by Allison | Dec. 19, 2010 at 5:48 PM
COMMENT:
English classes are meant for reading, not watching movies. Sandy Hingston says her son never read a book in his high school or college classes. And she believes kids are getting stupider. If teachers are not allowing kids to read books, then kids are getting stupider, but it's not their fault. If an English teacher doesn't allow for an English class to read books, then how are kids ever going to get smarter? I am in tenth grade and I have never watched a movie instead of reading a book, and I am glad for that. I could have never learn as much as I do by watching a movie over reading a book. I not only learn lessons from the book, but new words and new styles of writing that you cannot get that from watching a movie. And most kids, when given the opportunity to sit in a dark classroom and watch a movie, take up on the chance to sleep. So how are kids going to get any smarter if the teacher isn't giving them a chance to try? If all English classrooms around the world read books instead of watching...
English Class and Teachers
Posted by Allison | Dec. 19, 2010 at 5:48 PM
COMMENT:
English classes are meant for reading, not watching movies. Sandy Hingston says her son never read a book in his high school or college classes. And she believes kids are getting stupider. If teachers are not allowing kids to read books, then kids are getting stupider, but it's not their fault. If an English teacher doesn't allow for an English class to read books, then how are kids ever going to get smarter? I am in tenth grade and I have never watched a movie instead of reading a book, and I am glad for that. I could have never learn as much as I do by watching a movie over reading a book. I not only learn lessons from the book, but new words and new styles of writing that you cannot get that from watching a movie. And most kids, when given the opportunity to sit in a dark classroom and watch a movie, take up on the chance to sleep. So how are kids going to get any smarter if the teacher isn't giving them a chance to try? If all English classrooms around the world read books instead of watching...
From inside the classroom
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 21, 2010 at 6:07 AM
COMMENT:
I am a high school teacher. While I may not agree with the article in its entirety, there are parts that ring very true. High school students that I teach are a digital generation that has become dependant on the continuous instantaneous input coming from a vast array of digital devices. As to the question of literacy that depends on the individual. An example of thsi is the collpase of printed news. How many of you readers now get your news from digital snippets found on your web based home pages. Students may not be "stupider" but certainly egocentric to the point of not being social or having enough educational ethic to complete "old" school learning. If not why are so many schools not meeting their annual academic requirements?
A brilliant article -- how about a book?
Posted by Martin | Dec. 24, 2010 at 1:27 AM
COMMENT:
First let's deal with Tony's comment at the top. To see the whole article in one block -- easy! -- just click on Print Article. But thanks for illustrating what this article is talking about. Sandy, your article isn't just good, it's brilliant. And you've hit the nail on the head, albeit in passing rather than as the central idea. You say about Facebook et al.: "...what even we forget ... is that none of this is accidental. Big thinkers at big corporations dream this stuff up, test it, tweak it, perfect it, not to make it easier for us to find old friends, but to gather information about our behavior and make money off of it." And you're absolutely right. But the process goes way beyond fragmenting and wasting our time. Pretty much everything consumed by the American public -- such as electronics (cellphones, mp3 players), religion, processed "food" (if you can still call it that), pharmaceuticals, right-wing propaganda (Fox News!), our unbelievably narcissistic Culture of Celebrity that manufactures TV, movies and music, our bought-and-paid-for electoral politics -- today all of it is dreamt up by "big thinkers at big corporations" who "dream this stuff...
A brilliant article -- how about a book? (2)
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 24, 2010 at 1:36 AM
COMMENT:
...who "dream this stuff up, test it, tweak it, perfect it," not to make our lives better in any real sense -- quite the opposite, in fact (consider the fast-food-driven obesity epidemic, or the widening Republican-driven gap between rich and poor), but to "make money off of it." I.e., off of us! And our kids, because age denies them the critical thinking skills needed to see garbage as it really is, are the corporations' prime targets. They are being trained to behave like cattle in a feedlot, deliberately kept disorientated and rushing blindly from side to side in response to enticements ("fads") poked at them through the bars, to milk them of their money. Don't be discouraged by the cattle-sneers about your article (what can you expect from people whose brains have been fried by US culture?) -- keep going and write the book! For those readers who cant wait, start with "The Culture of Narcissism" by Christopher Lasch.
Loved the academia responses
Posted by Pete | Dec. 29, 2010 at 8:20 AM
COMMENT:
How could the Penn faculty say with a straight face that playing video games demonstrates managing complex systems? That quote will have people rolling on the floor in 20 years. If you want kids to truly use technology to manage complexity, then how about having them program a video game instead of playing one? Most kids today are NOT technology literate. They can't create anything with their technology. Being literate means a command of the language, in this case Objective C, Java... and so on.
This is ridiculous
Posted by Logan | Dec. 31, 2010 at 12:36 PM
COMMENT:
I've never seen a more ungrounded, half assed assessment of anything that I have ever read. You see such a small percentage of the teen population and you accent that as if it resembles the entire generation. I am 16 years old, I play video games and use facebook, but I read, I have read Crime and Punishment, The Iliad, the Odyssey, Count of Monte Cristo, Owen Meany, Gatsby, Le Mis, and countless others. Can you, Sandy Hingston, tell me who wrote the prince, who Carnegie sold his gigantic steel company too? Because I cannot tell you who Snookie is, or anything about Twilight, but I can tell you how to create a buffer in a solution of Hydrobromic acid to maintain a stable pH of 5.4, or how to properly research a generation to get accurate data when writing an article for a prominent magazine.
Furthermore
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 31, 2010 at 12:59 PM
COMMENT:
This is merely a reaction against something that you do not understand. I suggest that everyone who agrees that Sandy Hingston speaks the truth, open your eyes to change. Sandy Hingston is a bad parent, that is why her kids do not know the days of the week, that is unless she misquoted her son when he simply lost track of what day it was, something that happens to every person. Do you realize that your parents said the same thing about you? Their parents before them? On the other hand, your quiz is more insulting that your Article. Those 15 kids you interviewed were either all female, or handpicked to show how "out of it" our generation is. I can guarantee that I can find 3 adults for every 1 highschooler who cannot name our WWII allies. Ps. that ap english media course your son takes, is a joke. I wish I hade an Ap course so easy, for an idiot who does not know anything "according to his mother" to get an A? If only
I Disagree..
Posted by J | Jan. 1, 2011 at 12:15 PM
COMMENT:
As part of this young generation, I don't think we're getting dumber. I've actually posted about it in my new blog, so I would appreciate it if some people checked it out! click here
Read this.
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 6, 2011 at 3:54 PM
COMMENT:
Monday,Tuesday,Wendsday,Thursday,Friday,Saturday,Sunday.( Days of the week.) There are 12 months in a year. Jan, Feb, Mar,Ap,May,June,July,Aug,Sept,Oct,Nov,Dec. Your child is stupid. I'm in the 10th grade. Your the adult, TEACH HIM. I don't think its the teachers fault eitheir. IT'S YOURS. WHAT DID YOU TEACH HIM. If your such a big article writer why you didn't teach your son anything.? It's not all teens fault.....It's the adults. They show us the way....We learn from them, I bet you bought him a i pod.He uses it and it brain washes him. BECAUSE OF YOU. Don't EVER my that accusation to all kids because of your child's dum ass.Some of us want to make it in life. Bill Gates did it (Microsoft inventor,you say computers get you nowhere) (if your son didn't know)I damn as well can myself. Maybe your stupid.
Are you serious?
Posted by Russell | Jan. 6, 2011 at 5:43 PM
COMMENT:
The cultural submersion of children into the internet and other technology is just exposing them to differing options and more ideas than would have ever been accessible in the past. You call us ignorant, but it just looks like another case of the even more ignorant "kids these days" speech. I'm 16. I shouldn't have to tell you to grow up.
Are you serious?
Posted by Russell | Jan. 6, 2011 at 5:43 PM
COMMENT:
The cultural submersion of children into the internet and other technology is just exposing them to differing options and more ideas than would have ever been accessible in the past. You call us ignorant, but it just looks like another case of the even more ignorant "kids these days" speech. I'm 16. I shouldn't have to tell you to grow up.
Kneejerk reaction proves it
Posted by Jeff1840 | Jan. 12, 2011 at 3:44 PM
COMMENT:
The kneejerk reaction of so many of these comments might be good enough documentation to prove the assertions of the article. I have taught high school for more than ten years. Here are a few though
Napkins And Blogs
Posted by Kendall | Jan. 16, 2011 at 1:14 PM
COMMENT:
We just thought you would be interested in a unique marriage between hard copy (napkins) and soft copy (blog). After all, it's really all about promoting literacy in the family. Our story is at www.kendalldaddo.blogspot.com KD ~j~
This is STUPID and FAKE.
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM
COMMENT:
I am speaking on behalf of most teenagers when I say ADULTS spend just as much time on facebook. We are not stupid and mindless. I am 12 years old and about to finish my 150 page novel. Yes, some children are like that, but the majority are almost as smart of you adults. Next time, don't aim this towards the majority of people. WE ARE NOT MINDLESS AND STUPID.
Please stop stereotyping us
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 17, 2011 at 2:11 PM
COMMENT:
I am not quite fourteen years old. I do not have a facebook account; I know who invented pasteurization; I know who the Speaker of the house is. I do not watch television or movies at all. I read. I am about to start reading Moby DIck, because I want to. It isn't your son's fault that his school watches videos rather than reading books; your feelings there would be better directed at the school system.
teachers are dumb!
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 19, 2011 at 9:10 AM
COMMENT:
well i dont beleive that we are getting stupid! im a senior in HS in PA and i find this offensive! my math teacher doesnt teach a thing! when one of us has a question she says look in the back of the book. and thay she's the last resort? how are we gonna learn if our teachers dont teach? also we were doing online practices and she didnt know how to do the problem! what is this teaching world coming to? we're not getting stupid. our teachers are!
WOW
Posted by Rayshell | Jan. 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM
COMMENT:
This is quite interesting to me, because i think that this is very true to our society today. My younger brother has trouble reading and understand books but he can easily tell me about the zombies he killed on his Ipod. Although not all is to blame on technology today. When i was younger and even to this day my mother puts restrictions on the amount of technology i can use per day. I understand that people are upset about the "invasion" of technology but the truth is that without our parents buying it for us and not putting restrictions on it, who is really the blame? I sometimes think that parents and other adults have to find someone else to blame for their lack of parenting. I hope that nobody takes this the wrong way but in the end is it ever the other persons fault. I was raised to look in the mirror befor you look around you.
I agree with Anonymous
Posted by Rayshell | Jan. 25, 2011 at 7:57 AM
COMMENT:
You are very right, not all children or teens are like that. Just because one teenager is slacking does not mean we all are. Look at the full picture, there are still a lot of students who love to read. I am currently in an Advance English class and a Sophomore in High School and I just finished analyzing philosophy which is something most people don't do until college. I have to strongly disagree with this article because of this. I know, it is often hard for adults to realize that sometimes their kids like to slack. Yes, i agree the teachers should make the students read but also the child should go home at night and want to read and learn.
I agree with Anonymous
Posted by Rayshell | Jan. 25, 2011 at 7:57 AM
COMMENT:
You are very right, not all children or teens are like that. Just because one teenager is slacking does not mean we all are. Look at the full picture, there are still a lot of students who love to read. I am currently in an Advance English class and a Sophomore in High School and I just finished analyzing philosophy which is something most people don't do until college. I have to strongly disagree with this article because of this. I know, it is often hard for adults to realize that sometimes their kids like to slack. Yes, i agree the teachers should make the students read but also the child should go home at night and want to read and learn.
Havens M1
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 26, 2011 at 6:09 PM
COMMENT:
We don’t know the most basic stuff. I think that technology is makeing us more dumber. Insteed of going and finding the information by ourselves we find it by the internet. so we dont learn as much. And dont get me started on texting. People who text none stop over the summer when they get back to school when they write they use texting words. How Stupid.
Wow
Posted by Damani | Jan. 27, 2011 at 6:30 PM
COMMENT:
I think she's just mad because her son doesn't know how many days are in a week. A.k.a, this article is just about him, how stupid he is, and how sad she is that she's unable to fix it. Trust me, since your kid can't get into college, you must have no clue what other schools are doin. He got an A- in an english class not knowing the days in a week? Yea, he's in special ed miss.
Epic FAIL
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 31, 2011 at 5:20 PM
COMMENT:
You ought to stop trolling. This is the most ridiculously biased and subjective article impersonating fact and objectiveness that I have every had the displeasure of reading. In fact, there were so many opinionated statements that I could not bother to waste my time reading a scantily "researched" article, if you could even call it one. If your son watched movies all year preparing for the AP Literature test, I doubt he would even get a 1 on the test. And guess what, you get a 1 just for writing your name on the test. With no reading comprehension or essay practice, there is NO WAY that he would be prepared for the test, which is all reading comprehension of college-level literature and 3 essays on college-level reading, one of which is on a novel the student presumably read in advance.
Right...
Posted by Jay | Feb. 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM
COMMENT:
Just because we can Google information does not mean we don’t learn it. Do you know what 30 grays can do to you? Do you even know what a gray is? A gray is the scale in which radioactive gamma rays are measured. I bet you didn’t know that. I am fourteen, and I ask; where did you get these assumptions from? I use the internet, I use facebook, and I use games consoles. I have seen that people who use these things more -in my school- do better than those who don’t. I understand Shakespeare absolutely, and I don’t even have to read the notes. 90% of all students I know read. 95% of all students I know put more time into work and lesson than their social life. That means they are anti-social for not talking to other people. Make up your mind. Just because teenagers who are naturally inept at learning make a more perceptible mark, does not mean the quantity of us silent ones are exactly the same. You wouldn’t agree with me stereotyping adults as dispassionate. Why label us as unintelligent, when you don’t like being labelled either?
Kids are not dumb
Posted by Heather | Mar. 3, 2011 at 12:10 PM
COMMENT:
This article is extremely offensive, you act like all kids act like your son, not ALL kids are to dumb to know the day of the week, or the months or how to use a ruler! You also have no right to not say that we are human beings, just because kids tend to use the computer more doesn't mean we're not human, its like if I said adults read to much so they are not human, kids tend to know more by the end of their years in middle school than high school graduates did 50 years ago! i am an avid reader and have been reading at college level since 3rd grade, I don't get home til 7 some days because of my involvement in my school play as an actress and a costumer, I go t bed at 9 o'clock every night I have a facebook page with less than a hundred friends, and am taking all advanced classes with plenty of reading.
Failing to engage with one another?
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM
COMMENT:
As a high school teacher, I see teenagers actually LACKING social interaction, as a direct result of Facebook and cell phones. "Our kids don't ever have to be alone...and yet they are always alone." "They sit alone at home and count their "friends". How very sad.
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
The truth hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM
COMMENT:
I hates to say this, but they're right. We're getting more and more stupid every generation. Yet the article only refers to America. So what about the rest of hte world?
Stupid article
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 24, 2011 at 10:45 AM
COMMENT:
All they want us to do is pay attention to the ads on the side. u really need provide more sources before going around and making a 9 page aricle on seseless crap.
....Really now?
Posted by Melinda | May. 15, 2011 at 11:33 AM
COMMENT:
You have a major part in your child's education. Why don't you become more involved? The judgments and assumptions you make are absolutely ridiculous. Not all teenagers are your son. Honestly, I don't know where you get off saying such things. Ignorance can be dangerous.
 
Philadelphia It List

The Philadelphia Wine Festival

Join Philadelphia magazine and PA Wine & Spirits Stores at the Lincoln Financial Field and sample hundreds of wines at the most anticipated tasting event of the year.
 
 

Best of Philly 2011 iPhone App

For your iPhone: Keep the city's best restaurants, shops and services at your fingertips! Browse five years of winners including our brand-new 2011 list. Click to download now!
 
 
 
 
 

To view this page, you must be using Internet Explorer 7 or higher. Please visit microsoft.com for more information.